- Jun 2, 2011
- 13,501
- 57,356
He had to challenge for the ball very harsh to give that as an own goal...very unfair
I mean, he absolutely walloped it into his own net - it was about as clear an own goal as you can get.
He had to challenge for the ball very harsh to give that as an own goal...very unfair
He had to challenge for the ball very harsh to give that as an own goal...very unfair
Value must have dropped tonight - poor all round the pitch, capped off with own goal.
I wouldn’t give that as an own goal personally he had to challenge for the ball
I don't see how you can say that, the shot has barely any pace on it and the keeper is well behind it, he actively gets involved and kicks it, he didn't have to challenge for it at all, there was no attacking players pressing him.
Does every right back come with a user who has to defend every action that right back makes?
I wouldn’t give that as an own goal personally he had to challenge for the ball
Fair point. Its an own goal. Always knew he was crap. £70M you’re having a laugh.
you can do a lot with binary code 0101? PlebAh yes because there's nothing in between defending clear errors and calling him shit and no longer worth signing, total binary.
you can do a lot with binary code 0101? Pleb
It felt and looked panicked. It needed, in my opinion, the keeper to take charge and call it as his ball. He didn’t, which resulted in Wan-Bissaka feeling he had to clear it. The issue that arises as a result is that he is HUGELY one footed, no that he can’t defend, or clear a ball.I don't see how you can say that, the shot has barely any pace on it and the keeper is well behind it, he actively gets involved and kicks it, he didn't have to challenge for it at all, there was no attacking players pressing him.
Does every right back come with a user who has to defend every action that right back makes?
5?you can do a lot with binary code 0101? Pleb
The prickfucksAccording to Duncan Castles, Utd have agreed a £55m deal for AWB
According to Duncan Castles, Utd have agreed a £55m deal for AWB
Agree but also there really hasn't been any indication we were interested other than AliZ and others saying we won't pay their price. Also who knows if 55m is accurate, the base plus add-ons, or the max, etc.I don't think that seems ridiculously expensive
According to Duncan Castles, Utd have agreed a £55m deal for AWB
We should have been in there. Sell Trippier for £25m or so and it's a bargain.Agree but also there really hasn't been any indication we were interested other than AliZ and others saying we won't pay their price. Also who knows if 55m is accurate, the base plus add-ons, or the max, etc.
That's MUFC RB position sorted for the next decade. The cost will look peanuts if he continues with this progression. Many were scoffing when MUFC paid £30m for Rio in 02, didn't look so expensive by the time SAF retired!!!