- May 7, 2004
- 44,867
- 87,449
Utd and Arsenal win things and have done for a long time. It's a totally different prospect with Spurs who have won 3 trophies in 30 odd years. So again different situations, put Ange in a team with that winning belief maybe gets different results too. I don't think any manager should need to win a trophy to be afforded time tbh, it's an unlikely mission with what we provide to them.
- Ten Haag and Arteta were terrible in their first years (ETH still is), but they saved their jobs by winning things. Arteta won an FA Cup in his first year. ETH won a League Cup in his 1st year and an FA Cup in his second. We'd be happy with either of those scenarios imo
- I don't get the Klopp reference. You are implying Ange needs someone else to build his squad. Or is this about Arne Slot?
- There's very few managers that could match what Pep does. Ange is not one of them. He could have unlimited money that he would not be on that level.
- I think Emery has done better than us with arguably less quality
Referring to current managers so yes Slot taking on a Klopp squad.
Not possible to say how another manager would do with City and their resources. Pep is top though but nobody can say what Ange would achieve there. Unlikely to win as much but who really knows, I'm sure he would win things. Point is you can't really compare.
Emery has done well at Villa but they were neck and neck with us with similar quality and he was there a bit longer as well. See how they do selling Watkins without signing another centre forward last season. Again just can't really compare situations. They also don't have the same pressure and expectation we have. One thing Conte said right was our players don't like to play with pressure. Maybe he does better with Villa who knows.
Like I say I don't really know how you rate a manager against others unless they manage the same situation. Every club and situation is different. Conte and Jose win at other clubs but not us says it all really.