- Jun 18, 2012
- 8,857
- 14,180
Lange should be under more pressure than Ange IMO.
He should be hoping a lot of these kids come good. Otherwise, he won't be here very long.
What was Lange's remit from above..
Lange should be under more pressure than Ange IMO.
He should be hoping a lot of these kids come good. Otherwise, he won't be here very long.
Couldn’t be more on the money. If our transfer strategy is to bring in young high potential players over established stars like Eze or Neto then we need to play these young players.
If Ange isn’t going to change his tactics when they’re not working he needs to change the personnel if the players he’s picking aren’t working. We paid 1st team level fees for these young players, so they should be in the first team if we think their ability justified the fees.
Listening to Ange post match
Listening to his interview post match you will see them on Wednesday and if we get knocked out there will be the same reaction as last season about not giving priority to the domestic cups with senior players being selected
What was Lange's remit from above..
Given best part of squad is the defensive personnel we have, I will not be against a back3. Back3 need not be seen as defensive system.
Vicario
Romero Dragusin VDV
Porro Bissouma Bentancur Udogie
Maddison/Bergvall
Solanke Son
I agree with these points completely but I’m more concerned that the goals we concede seem to be pretty much carbon copies of each fairly regularly. I’ve no great insight or tactical knowledge of football and reading your posts over the years I’m sure you know more than me, but I’m very concerned that the same problems keep arising without being solvedGotcha.
Sure Ange isn't immune to criticism, but surely no manager can be appraised properly without getting them the appropriate players for how they play.
Our board refuses to do that. Sabotaging each manager time after time for decades.
Look at Pep's first season before he spent big (ie £150m on three FBs). Before that we took them apart at WHL. Many teams did. "Has he been found out in the PL?" was the narrative.
Klopp was on thin ice with Liverpool fans until he got Allison, Van Dyke, and Fabinho. We battered them too at Wembley.
Ange needed a starting quality technical winger. His football is about creating a very high number of quality 1v1 situations out wide.
He got Odobert and Yang as ones for the future, and Werner who has no use in this role whatsoever.
None are starting.
This summer we failed to address our biggest weakness, so if people aren't turning on the board, then we at least need to give Ange the patience to turn youngsters into starters.
Because no manager in world football is turning Johnson and Werner into Doku or Nico Williams. It just isn't happening.
These are both highly predictable and very limited players who cough up the ball constantly in the final third.
Yeah , I know it's a different situation to the Fulham match but if Archie, Djed and Lucas play and it sounds like they will plus Radu & Ben and maybe Forster in goal, if we go out there will be an avalanche of criticism.But the only ones we bought played well pre season and had a fair shout at starting so I don’t see it as the same as last season when we played back up players without a future at the club
In the couple of pages up to this post, you've said people are "virtue signalling" and using a "straw man argument".Straw man argument, no one is expecting us to be title challengers overnight but it we want to see progress on the consistent failures that aren’t being addressed
Absolutely, £40m for Gray should see him starting every week for meCouldn’t be more on the money. If our transfer strategy is to bring in young high potential players over established stars like Eze or Neto then we need to play these young players.
If Ange isn’t going to change his tactics when they’re not working he needs to change the personnel if the players he’s picking aren’t working. We paid 1st team level fees for these young players, so they should be in the first team if we think their ability justified the fees.
Paratici was working for the same board...
He managed to work within the confines well enough.
Have we actually created enough good chances to say that poor finishing has cost us?Most frustrating thing is that I still think we should have won four out of four so far this season with the majority of the way we've played.
But stupid mistakes and poor finishing and repeat...
Maybe optimistic but I still feel like it should click at some point. These attacking players are better than they're showing, even if they're not world beaters etc.
Price tag is u fortunate for an 18 year old, I mean Johnson was 50 million and he really shouldn’t be starting!Absolutely, £40m for Gray should see him starting every week for me
What was Lange's remit from above..
The bigger question is what’s stopping him starting. Odobert starts and is young and was £30mPrice tag is u fortunate for an 18 year old, I mean Johnson was 50 million and he really shouldn’t be starting!
reduce the wage bill yet hoodwink people into thinking we're backing the manager.
I’m bringing the you don’t want thisIn the couple of pages up to this post, you've said people are "virtue signalling" and using a "straw man argument".
If you use the term "gaslighting" in the next few pages til I catch up, I'm calling woke bingo!
Not quite - Conte was 3-4-3 typically with Son, Kane and Kuli as the front 3 - he did not usually play with a 10, and IF reports are to be believed he turned down the chance to sign Maddison.looks like we have finally built a team for Conte’s 3412 system.
you are right that is probably our best team on paper. Funny how we have final built a Conte team but lack a team for Ange cos the wingers are average.
Maybe with the next manager we will build a team for Ange when Ange is gone.