- Dec 9, 2006
- 3,764
- 9,268
What is your point? British athletics have a 99 year lease on the stadium they are not just going to give that up.
That the stadium doesn't work, nor ever will in its current form.
That Levy was correct that the only sensible option, if the stadium was to be retained as a major football venue, was to build a new stadium on the foundations of the 'former' athletics stadium, with a contribution to UK Athletics to fund an upgrade to Crystal Palace.
That the 2012 Legacy team were wrong in listening to Seb Coe about retaining the venue as an athletics stadium.
That once again the taxpayer got shafted by politicians, big business and vested interests in the process.
Last edited: