- May 26, 2004
- 4,781
- 2,108
Lennon is a much better winger than Walcott, but is not as good as a striker. His football brain overall is more developed, but Walcott is very good at scoring one on ones and obviously his pace can get him into those positions.
Its no surprise that Walcott's best performances come when his team is counter attacking, because that is when there is space behind the opposition's back line. Lennon, on the other hand, has the skill and balance to take people on and quickness of feet to get in and out of tight spaces.
How he does agaist Evra will depend on who is playing infront of Evra. Normally, with either Ronaldo or Nani, they dont track back and, like Weds, Lennon one on one with any full back creates something.
Its no surprise that Walcott's best performances come when his team is counter attacking, because that is when there is space behind the opposition's back line. Lennon, on the other hand, has the skill and balance to take people on and quickness of feet to get in and out of tight spaces.
How he does agaist Evra will depend on who is playing infront of Evra. Normally, with either Ronaldo or Nani, they dont track back and, like Weds, Lennon one on one with any full back creates something.