Bluto Blutarsky
Well-Known Member
- Mar 4, 2021
- 19,394
- 86,579
Surely that should be for Toney... the marketing opportunities would be endless...
Jadon Sancho
- Thread starter Archibald&Crooks
- Start date
Col_M
Pointing out the Obvious
- Feb 28, 2012
- 23,577
- 47,972
I'm sure this would be funny if I understood the reference.
BedfordshireSpud
Well-Known Member
- Jul 21, 2012
- 572
- 1,780
That spat with ETH has taken a lot out of Sancho judging by that photo!
barry
Bring me Messi
- May 22, 2005
- 6,669
- 15,832
888.com. Massive gambling site
hughy
I'm SUPER cereal.
- Nov 18, 2007
- 32,859
- 60,742
Think 888 is just generally known as a lucky number isn't it? Particularly in East Asia. Would be more fitting for Yang.
GlennHuddlestone
Well-Known Member
- Jul 28, 2011
- 281
- 747
Yes. 8 is a lucky number in Chinese culture.
mark87
Well-Known Member
- Nov 29, 2004
- 37,838
- 128,317
Would make sense to save that number for Toney
In case it's the concept of legacy numbers that you didn't understand...
Legacy Numbers: The full list | Tottenham Hotspur
Check out the full list of our Legacy Numbers
www.tottenhamhotspur.com
Frozen_Waffles
Well-Known Member
- Jan 26, 2005
- 4,268
- 11,454
Don't see the point...
1. He has never put together a decent run of games in the PL
2. He doesn't track back
3. Attitude issues
4. He's not actually that good anyway
5. His wages
6. He'd block game time of Johnson/Oderbert/Kulusevski/Moore
Massively hyped player with little substance, unless Ange has given up on Johnson then this seems pointless.
On loan it is marginally possible, as a permanent signing we wouldn't and shouldn't be offering him anywhere near his current wage.
I really don't see the benefit for us or Sancho.
He can't get ahead of Dialo, Rashford, Garnacho or even Anthony at United and when he has played for them (a while ago now) he looked distinctly average. Yes, yes, it could be the manager, but he's not good enough to be taking the risk on imo.
I'd be surprised if there is anything in this.
1. He has never put together a decent run of games in the PL
2. He doesn't track back
3. Attitude issues
4. He's not actually that good anyway
5. His wages
6. He'd block game time of Johnson/Oderbert/Kulusevski/Moore
Massively hyped player with little substance, unless Ange has given up on Johnson then this seems pointless.
On loan it is marginally possible, as a permanent signing we wouldn't and shouldn't be offering him anywhere near his current wage.
I really don't see the benefit for us or Sancho.
He can't get ahead of Dialo, Rashford, Garnacho or even Anthony at United and when he has played for them (a while ago now) he looked distinctly average. Yes, yes, it could be the manager, but he's not good enough to be taking the risk on imo.
I'd be surprised if there is anything in this.
worcestersauce
"I'm no optimist I'm just a prisoner of hope
- Jan 23, 2006
- 27,560
- 46,915
So could it be he makes the move he wanted eight years ago?
fishhhandaricecake
Well-Known Member
- Nov 15, 2018
- 21,949
- 54,688
That would’ve been better on Toney
What's in a number as long as this materializes?
coy-spurs1882
Well-Known Member
- Aug 31, 2012
- 4,380
- 11,656
wouldn't mind this to happen but at the same time wouldn't be bothered if this doesn't happen
fishhhandaricecake
Well-Known Member
- Nov 15, 2018
- 21,949
- 54,688
1. He had a little spell for Man.U but mostly fair point
2. Not sure that’s entirely true tbh
3. Could just be that he didn’t get on with Ten Haag
4. He was absolutely phenomenal for Dortmund especially first time round, there is certainly a quality player in there somewhere for sure
5. Yes his wages are probably a bit high. could be offset with a Reggie loan to them?
6. He’d not block Kulu as he’d mostly play RW or LW, and there would be plenty of minutes to go around, we still lack 1 top RW player and we’ll regret not signing another one later in the season once injuries and fatigue starts to kick in across hopefully deep runs in 4 competitions.
1 yr loan would be perfect for us imo but doubt it’ll happen.
Led's Zeppelin
Can't Re Member
- May 28, 2013
- 7,601
- 21,192
So is that a yes or a no?
mightyspur
Now with lovely smooth balls
- Aug 21, 2014
- 10,030
- 27,859
You seem on the fence.
s_purs
Well-Known Member
- Aug 27, 2013
- 261
- 415
I would 100% love this. Always rated him, and he was immense at BD. Hard to judge as he clearly doesn't get on with Ten Hag, if Ange thinks he can get him back to his best I'm fully up for a loan with option, or obligation if he plays enough games.
Young, HG, exciting player, great dribbler, quick, just needs to find a home and his spark again.
He also fits in positions we need cover.
Young, HG, exciting player, great dribbler, quick, just needs to find a home and his spark again.
He also fits in positions we need cover.
Frozen_Waffles
Well-Known Member
- Jan 26, 2005
- 4,268
- 11,454
I don't know the ins and outs of his relationship with ETH so let's give him a pass on his attitude issues....
His 'good' stint at Dortmund last came in the 2020-21 season, which is a while back now. His recent time at Dortmund is 14 games 2 goals and 2 assists, hardly prolific for a player playing in a good team in Germany. Infact the last good season he's had is that 20-21 season.
He may get minutes, but I doubt he'd nail down a first team spot, and will Sancho be happy with minutes here and there, and will spurs be happy paying a still high wage (no matter how we do the deal) for a bit part player?
