- Aug 29, 2012
- 1,934
- 6,332
Happens all the time on here. We would be shit at the numbers game on countdownNobody has said this. This is another case of 2+2=5
Happens all the time on here. We would be shit at the numbers game on countdownNobody has said this. This is another case of 2+2=5
Those might not seem that sexy, but alongside Ødegaard and Rice they had a press and determination miles above us.You are getting funny replies but Havertz, Saka, Martinelli/Trossard was for that lot down the road.
I think that attack can easily contend if Ange gets the balance right. We have 2 world class CBs behind it too, plus a very promising GK and LB IMO.
Surely not… with emerson going we have a transfer profit and still have 4 more players to shift, if we sell richie too they must be enough money for all 3No….Richy will fund Solanke
So we're getting 9 thenNobody has said this. This is another case of 2+2=5
Those might not seem that sexy, but alongside Ødegaard and Rice they had a press and determination miles above us.
We can put up all the sexy names we want up front, but if there are no large leap in our midfield/attacking press, we will fall short again.
The press of Bisouma, Maddison, Jhonson and Son at times was appalling last season.
You are correct.I assume I missed the time anyone said we were going for all three. I thought it was 2 from 3
When you say strongest pressing do you mean press frequency or press effectiveness though? Big difference between a proper coached and structured press to just barking at players to chase down more. I felt last season at times it was lacking and we allowed opponents to counter attack us too easily. However, better ball retention in theory means you have to do less pressing, so if tiredness was the cause over organisation then that is easier to address.The press wasn’t the issue, we were statistically one of the strongest pressing sides in the league.
Our primary issue in attack was lack of quality in possession technically, lack of ball retention and lack of 1v1 ability.
I don't think this one is dead yet. If Saudi pays us in a single installment for Richy I can see us either triggering the Eze release or the money being there forcing CP to the negotiating table.Tottenham confident of signing £65m Dominic Solanke
Forward scored 19 league goals for Bournemouth last season and has £65million release clause, which north London side may have to fund by selling Richarlison to Saudi clubwww.thetimes.com
Although Tottenham like Eberechi Eze, they do not want to meet Crystal Palace’s demand for the bulk of the £60million release clause to be paid up front, which has complicated a possible move.
This. This makes sense to me. I can’t understand why we’d sell Richy otherwise but if we get a big up front sum then we can do a big upfront sum for Eze and be more creative on the other moves in the meantime.I don't think this one is dead yet. If Saudi pays us in a single installment for Richy I can see us either triggering the Eze release or the money being there forcing CP to the negotiating table.
No we're getting a 9 (Solanke)So we're getting 9 then
no they have no reason to come to the table pay it or move on unless we offer them something stupid.I don't think this one is dead yet. If Saudi pays us in a single installment for Richy I can see us either triggering the Eze release or the money being there forcing CP to the negotiating table.
Don’t fully agree - there may be things they would like that are outside the scope of the release clause. For example, we could potentially really hamper them if we make our bid too late for them to spend the money well. If they got the feeling it’s inevitable we are actually going to trigger the deal, they may feel it’s worth it to negotiate (slightly, not dramatically altering the structure) in order to have some control over aspects like timing.no they have no reason to come to the table pay it or move on unless we offer them something stupid.
The answer from parish was no ! We have tried the above through intermediaries and offered more like I have said they don’t want to lose eze . The promise to him was he can go if they get there RC !Don’t fully agree - there may be things they would like that are outside the scope of the release clause. For example, we could potentially really hamper them if we make our bid too late for them to spend the money well. If they got the feeling it’s inevitable we are actually going to trigger the deal, they may feel it’s worth it to negotiate (slightly, not dramatically altering the structure) in order to have some control over aspects like timing.
Still don’t think Levy will bite on this though.
The answer from parish was no ! We have tried the above through intermediaries and offered more like I have said they don’t want to lose eze . The promise to him was he can go if they get there RC !
Right, but it seems like they know we won’t actually trigger the clause (probably because parish knows levy better than that!) and keeping Eze is their best case scenario - if they really thought we were going to do it no matter what, they would be incentivized to negotiate on small things to end up with a deal that would be better for them than just 65m on deadline day.The answer from parish was no ! We have tried the above through intermediaries and offered more like I have said they don’t want to lose eze . The promise to him was he can go if they get there RC !
No, I haven’t.You've got that the wrong way round. A release clause takes the power out of the clubs hands and into the players. No release clause means club can say no or ask what they want. Release clause means they have limited or no say.
You are assuming that the release clause is effective right up to the end of the window.Right, but it seems like they know we won’t actually trigger the clause (probably because parish knows levy better than that!) and keeping Eze is their best case scenario - if they really thought we were going to do it no matter what, they would be incentivized to negotiate on small things to end up with a deal that would be better for them than just 65m on deadline day.
Your last paragraph sums it up perfectlyThe press wasn’t the issue, we were statistically one of the strongest pressing sides in the league.
Our primary issue in attack was lack of quality in possession technically, lack of ball retention and lack of 1v1 ability.
One thing is "pressing" high, but if you move 1 -2 second after the ball has passed it is already to late. this happened all the time.The press wasn’t the issue, we were statistically one of the strongest pressing sides in the league.
Our primary issue in attack was lack of quality in possession technically, lack of ball retention and lack of 1v1 ability.