El Presidente In Absentia
- Jun 6, 2005
Ironically the 'veteran' as you call him actually posted in this thread (talk about hypocritical), and to say i wasn't supported is a bit of an understatement as i was litterally told to quieten down or else in fact, and as a result it was me who decided not to grace this site with my banners anymore.Chuba and another 'veteran' of the site had a falling out. It couldn't be resolved amicably. Chuba felt he wasn't given enough support in this dispute from the Mods. We didn't agree. As a result of this he is no longer doing the banners.
This i cannot agree with what one person sees as hounding, another sees as harassement in which it became unbearable for me to post anything anywhere without being hounded out by this individual and then susequently being reported by him.However, at no point has any 'hounding' been done.
Your reply was:Christophe said:And Chuba (this is slightly more grown up post), just for the record, Stoof was pointing out how Tickers would have been able to watch the game. I on the other hand was warning you about making accusations like that. You seem to go so over the top at people quite a lot (e.g. havin' a right go at an Egyptian fan, accusing him of being a Gooner WRONGLY, accusing Tickers of lying WRONGLY).
This carried on a bit and you even went back to random old threads of Christophe's to neg rep him and leave comments telling him to "get a life".Chuba said:Fuck off with your handbag Stophe, no one asked you to back up anyone, Stoof explained that Tickers was a press man end of... are u a mod...Nooo! so fuck off!
You basically both got told to grow up and leave it out.Stoof said:I've just read through your exchanges in the Match Thread.
Now considering we won, there's usually not a lot for the mods to do, as the violence tends to break out when we lose and people are disagreeing over who is the worst.
But to see 2 well established, longevitivised [yeah, that's a word] members going at it is not the sort of example I and the other Mods expect to see.
Chuba, it's not your place to call people liars or make false accusations as ChRiStOpHe correctly pointed out.
ChRiStOpHe, it's not your place to tell him that - if you've got a problem let the Mods deal with it - which is what Chuba's point was.
I don't care who started what, or who called whoever's Mum fat, what I do know is that the sort of member abuse coupled with direct and nasty swearing from the pair of you is not tolerated here.
This is a warning to the pair of you that it will not be tolerated in the future - I'm sorry to be so officious but it doesn't set an example to the new members. Like it or not, the post counts and rep come with a responsibilty and people will wrongly or rightly look up to you. It is up to you people as regular contributors to show the way.
Thanks for your time. And cut it 'the fuck' out.
You go on to state thatChuba said:I am sick and tired of Stoof picking up everything that i say as an accusation and he was probably warned by a certain Christophe on here who imo is one of the biggest wankers that posts on SC.
FACT: Christophe has reported you ONCE in as far back as I looked and that was only AFTER you'd gone through and neg repped an old post of his and told him to get a life.Chuba said:to be hounded left right and centre by a certain Christophe who reports everything that i write as being 'accusational' then to have Stoof back up this theory is just a little too much
Is that enough or do I need to go on?Chuba said:it won't stop his boyfriends from reporting the slightest comment i make about whatever, so the best solution for me is to quit SC
As would yours. You chose to post your reply and make it appear as if you were the victim in all of this and that it was the mods fault for allowing you to be "hounded" off the site and that's not fair the amount of time they've spent dealing with all of this.Rob wouldn't your reply been better in a PM?
Maybe you should try to find all the posts that i have insulted or been aggressive to people on here and i think your find maybe 5-10 in all out of 5899 posts over a period of 5 years which is the time that i have been on this site.
To say that i held the site to ransom is completly ridiculous i had a word with Geez saying that i would be stopping to produce graphical elements for this site as i thought that my arguments in defending myself were not justly weighed up or treated equally by the admin or mods on here.
You have made your point and i respect that but there are always 2 sides to an argument or dispute and lets face it if your not with SC your judged to be against it apparently.
This is below:To say that i held the site to ransom is completly ridiculous i had a word with Geez saying that i would be stopping to produce graphical elements for this site as i thought that my arguments in defending myself were not justly weighed up or treated equally by the admin or mods on here.
You state that Stoof was "accusing you" which makes it sound like you didn't do anything but the funny this is you DID and it's something you've done a fair few times before. Stoof asked you just to calm down a bit and that was it.Chuba said:Im sorry to tell you but i have decided to suspend my match banners for SC after a recent PM from Stoof accusing me AGAIN of hassling/accusing a member of being a gooner.
I am sick and tired of Stoof picking up everything that i say as an accusation and he was probably warned by a certain Christophe on here who imo is one of the biggest wankers that posts on SC.
LOL no thanks MrBoom i'll leave the spells up to you.Chuba, would you like to take over as the resident Spellcaster for SC? I
They were communications with the mods. These were the mods that you stated you felt let you feel "harassed", unsupported and "hounded off" the site.But To quote me systematically in what were PRIVATE messages and then to display them in this thread i feel is a very under hand technique to make the other person look aggressive and of an abusing nature.