Chelsea really have become the shambles we expected them to become, it's just happening 10 years later than I expected.
It can only be a matter of time until this lot get the book thrown at them.
Gray and Bergvall still only 18.
Yes they need bedding into the first team but anyone who doesn't think Gallagher offers a lot of depth in a midfield that boasts an inconsistent Bissouma and a long term injury recovering Bentancur with Sarr and a couple of kids is fooling themselves.
He'd be a...
Personally think Eze, Neto and another defensive option will be our incomings and that'll be our lot.
I'd be happy with Eze and Neto and to have Spence as backup RB, Davies as backup LB.
If offered Eze and Neto as our last 2 signings, I'm taking that all day long
If he wanted Baena then why have we constantly been linked with Neto and Eze.
We are Tottenham Hotspur, we should never have issues getting g players from clubs like Wolves or Crystal Palace, especially with how well run our finances have been in recent times.
If we genuinely want them after...
We needed a 6, we've got one that is highly rated and one that we can mould around the future of the club.
Sarr, Bergvall and Gray to grow your long term midfield around looks ace.
Very happy with this signing and the philosophy the club is now trying to implement. We can't compete with the...
Doue, Gray, Isak, Eze, Neto.... the kind of level I expect a club like ours to target.
The Atouba and Stambouli days firmly behind us now but the club simply needs to be bold and push through for who they want
Just pay the release clause then. Any other relatively big team wanting someone of Eze's calibre would so why can't we? Wasn't that the whole purpose of spending on the stadium in the first place?
Vicario, Porro, Van De Ven, Romero, Dragusin, Udogie, Bentancur, Bergvall, Eze, Maddison, Werner, Johnson, Son would be a really great base to grow a young, exciting squad over the next couple of windows. We are only 1 signing away from that with the signing of Eze and it would take that group...
We have the money. If we want him we should get him.
Our advantage is the excellent finances we have. Whats the point in having great finances if we can't occasionally use them to our advantage?
I'm sorry but I've seen so many teams chucking it around, its time we did a move here and there to...
For 50m, absolutely no chance. 35m-40m tops. Last year of his contract absolutely no way they will get 50m unless its from a club that hasn't got a clue what to do when it comes to negotiating and a fair price all circumstances considered
He's a goer and our team could really do with a goer. I'm completely in if it's replacing Hojbjerg or Skipp in our squad. Immediately a massive upgrade, HG also. What's the downside?
A reminder to those browsing without an account, it's quick and easy to Register Here. Come and join the fun!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.