What's new

Jose Mourinho

How do you feel about Mourinho appointment

  • Excited - silverware here we come baby

    Votes: 666 46.7%
  • Meh - will give him a chance and hope he is successful

    Votes: 468 32.8%
  • Horrified - praying for the day he'll fuck off

    Votes: 292 20.5%

  • Total voters
    1,426

Rusta81

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
362
549
First of all I also gave him credit for today

A) Because from what I’ve seen in his third season at Chelsea, his period at United and with us. He’s not showed me anything that tells me he’s improved and modernised as a manager. He doesn’t know how to set up a attack without counter attacks and individual performances

B) Of course you can never be sure that any manager will work out but we desperately need a rebuild and he’s not the man for that. We need to make our squad younger and he prefers older and more experienced players
To be fair the two guys he’s signed are Gedson 19 and Steve B 23? Or something.
 

thekneaf

Well-Known Member
Jan 18, 2011
1,934
3,878
He also signed Fred, Bailly, Lindelof, Pogba, Lukaku, Dalot all reasonably young or very young for United.

Yes Sanchez was not good, and Matic was old but also effective.

Don't let the media narrative obscure the facts. There are enough real issues to gripe about with Jose, pick one of them.
 

enfieldyid

Active Member
Sep 22, 2004
63
164
He also signed Fred, Bailly, Lindelof, Pogba, Lukaku, Dalot all reasonably young or very young for United.

Yes Sanchez was not good, and Matic was old but also effective.

Don't let the media narrative obscure the facts. There are enough real issues to gripe about with Jose, pick one of them.
A) His Ego
B) His Inconsistent man management skills
C) Boring style of play
D) Highest spending Manager of all time.
E) Reliance on individual attacking talent
 

spursfan77

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2005
46,682
104,959
Sean Dyche was getting mentioned over the weekend.

Reminds me of when there was a section of this board asking for fucking Tony Pulis when AVB was sacked. I’d love to call those people out now but it doesn’t seem the search function goes back that far.

edit: seems I was wrong!

 
Last edited:

Albertbarich

Well-Known Member
Jul 4, 2020
5,178
19,697
Reminds me of when there was a section of this board asking for fucking Tony Pulis when AVB was sacked.
I remember hearing that on other boards

Although to be fair many people myself included thought Harry redknapp fell into that category and look bow that turned out.
 

emiley heskey

Well-Known Member
Jul 3, 2020
1,121
1,832
He also signed Fred, Bailly, Lindelof, Pogba, Lukaku, Dalot all reasonably young or very young for United.

Yes Sanchez was not good, and Matic was old but also effective.

Don't let the media narrative obscure the facts. There are enough real issues to gripe about with Jose, pick one of them.

Matic also got new two year deals for United because of his impressive performance .. Matic is far better than any other defensive midfielder we have in our squad
 

fishhhandaricecake

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2018
19,229
48,077
Yep. It was a one off tactic for them. Doubt we will play like that again
I've noticed that Jose really does seem to try and adapt slightly for every single opponent. The formation and tactics might not differ hugely everytime as usually we play the 4-2-3-1 with 3 atb in build-up and push the RB further on and tuck the AM's inside but we often fall into a mid or low block 4-4-2 when without the ball. Today the difference was we played the 4-4-2/4-4-1-1- and held that shape when we attacked as well.

Its interesting that Jose does this, some will say its great and it comes back to the arguement that Poch never had a good plan B or reacted in games enough and some will say we should have a single effective system that we master like wolves, sheff.utd, liverpool/man.city etc.

I don't think there is a right or wrong particularly its just how you see the game, do you rather focus on your opponents strengths and try to play to minimise those whilst also capitalising on their weaknesses or do you focus more on your own strengths and let the opponent worry more about you. Different schools of thought.
 

Shadydan

Well-Known Member
Jul 7, 2012
38,247
104,143
Different league mate. I don’t think you can be successful as a top team playing that way in the prem.

Not sure what the league has to do with it, football is football no matter where it's played. Formations are of course important but they come secondary to application and desire, I don't see a reason why it would fail if everyone buys into it.

It's not as if Atletico haven't been successful using it against English teams.
 

emiley heskey

Well-Known Member
Jul 3, 2020
1,121
1,832
Not sure what the league has to do with it, football is football no matter where it's played. Formations are of course important but they come secondary to application and desire, I don't see a reason why it would fail if everyone buys into it.

It's not as if Atletico haven't been successful using it against English teams.

Atletico schooled liverpool the best english team at this moment by playing this style of football ... They have beaten barcelona couple of times, pep guardiola's munich, psg, even chelsea by playing this way ...
 

Shadydan

Well-Known Member
Jul 7, 2012
38,247
104,143
Athletico madrid has played with this style in champions league and have become runner up two times, multiple quarter and semi final appearances lol ...

Yeah the thing is people just put way too much emphasis on formations as if they are playing chess, yeah formations are key in the way you implement your gameplan but they aren't the be all and end all of how to win a match, it comes down to good old fashioned desire and the ability to be able to implement a successful gameplan over your opponents.

People are acting as if this is going to be the blueprint for Jose in every match, it isn't. We setup 4-4-2 because it helped us take advantage of Arsenal's weaknesses and played to our strength's, but we still had to fight for the win on the pitch - that is how you win football matches not solely relying on the formation.
 
Top