What's new

The Daily ITK Discussion Thread - Groundhog Day you say? Groundhog Day you say?

Status
Not open for further replies.

dagraham

Well-Known Member
Sep 20, 2005
19,128
46,117
If I recall correctly, Winks is the only youth player that has been promoted into the seniors by Poch (I do not include the occasional bench warmers like Onomah, Edwards and co). Players like Bentaleb, Townsend and Mason he inherited from Sherwood's / AVB's reign, where they were then moved on. My point is the myth Poch promoted and encouraged the youth was exactly that, a myth.

He did it at Southampton though I think? Unless they too were in fact blooded by their previous manager?
 
Last edited:

Archibald&Crooks

Aegina Expat
Admin
Feb 1, 2005
55,585
205,046
I think the idea of Poch promoting youth is seen differently at club/professional level than it is by us. He gave enough of them a taste of first team football no matter how fleeting and for a young footballer that's a no small thing. Even being in the squad or travelling to games would be a fantastic learning experience for many of them. For us, it's so what he didn't get much game time and that's about it.

The way I look at it is if they were good enough, they'd have been picked more often. I don't care how many actually made the breakthrough, Poch gave young footballers a chance IMO, its not exclusive to promoting from within. There seems to be this acceptance that he had to 'discover' them or be the first one to have picked them and I don't feel that way either, IIRC (and I may well be wrong here) we had one of the youngest, if not the youngest team in the Premier League competing at the very highest level and that's no mean achievement, no matter who was responsible for discovering them, signing them or feeding them on Farley Rusks. He took a bunch of young footballers and made them into a top team. IMO that's where he got his reputation from.

There's also another factor. As we got more and more 'successful' it became harder to do. It's much more difficult to take someone from the youth team and give them as lot of game time. Had he done so and not got results you can bet both your bollocks we'd have been on his case for not taking it seriously, picking the wrong team and all the rest of it. Could he have done that a bit more? Probably but I really don't think we missed out on the next big thing because he didn't.

Anyway, I think that overall he did more than OK for us and I won't spend too much time dwelling on wether or not he did this and that, all managers do stuff differently and we'll all have a different view on it. Mine might well be a load of bollocks though TBF :D

Overall, the guy is a legend, sadly it went wrong, probably due to a number of factors most of which we've all named but we'll never truly have the truth on.

Thank you for reading me, my names A&C, goodnight.
 

Snarfalicious

Well-Known Member
Jul 15, 2012
15,713
71,961
I think the idea of Poch promoting youth is seen differently at club/professional level than it is by us. He gave enough of them a taste of first team football no matter how fleeting and for a young footballer that's a no small thing. Even being in the squad or travelling to games would be a fantastic learning experience for many of them. For us, it's so what he didn't get much game time and that's about it.

The way I look at it is if they were good enough, they'd have been picked more often. I don't care how many actually made the breakthrough, Poch gave young footballers a chance IMO, its not exclusive to promoting from within. There seems to be this acceptance that he had to 'discover' them or be the first one to have picked them and I don't feel that way either, IIRC (and I may well be wrong here) we had one of the youngest, if not the youngest team in the Premier League competing at the very highest level and that's no mean achievement, no matter who was responsible for discovering them, signing them or feeding them on Farley Rusks. He took a bunch of young footballers and made them into a top team. IMO that's where he got his reputation from.

There's also another factor. As we got more and more 'successful' it became harder to do. It's much more difficult to take someone from the youth team and give them as lot of game time. Had he done so and not got results you can bet both your bollocks we'd have been on his case for not taking it seriously, picking the wrong team and all the rest of it. Could he have done that a bit more? Probably but I really don't think we missed out on the next big thing because he didn't.

Anyway, I think that overall he did more than OK for us and I won't spend too much time dwelling on wether or not he did this and that, all managers do stuff differently and we'll all have a different view on it. Mine might well be a load of bollocks though TBF :D

Overall, the guy is a legend, sadly it went wrong, probably due to a number of factors most of which we've all named but we'll never truly have the truth on.

Thank you for reading me, my names A&C, goodnight.

Great post, you should post more often.
 

robertgoulet

SC Resident Crooner Extraordinaire
Jul 23, 2013
3,610
12,552
I think the idea of Poch promoting youth is seen differently at club/professional level than it is by us. He gave enough of them a taste of first team football no matter how fleeting and for a young footballer that's a no small thing. Even being in the squad or travelling to games would be a fantastic learning experience for many of them. For us, it's so what he didn't get much game time and that's about it.

The way I look at it is if they were good enough, they'd have been picked more often. I don't care how many actually made the breakthrough, Poch gave young footballers a chance IMO, its not exclusive to promoting from within. There seems to be this acceptance that he had to 'discover' them or be the first one to have picked them and I don't feel that way either, IIRC (and I may well be wrong here) we had one of the youngest, if not the youngest team in the Premier League competing at the very highest level and that's no mean achievement, no matter who was responsible for discovering them, signing them or feeding them on Farley Rusks. He took a bunch of young footballers and made them into a top team. IMO that's where he got his reputation from.

There's also another factor. As we got more and more 'successful' it became harder to do. It's much more difficult to take someone from the youth team and give them as lot of game time. Had he done so and not got results you can bet both your bollocks we'd have been on his case for not taking it seriously, picking the wrong team and all the rest of it. Could he have done that a bit more? Probably but I really don't think we missed out on the next big thing because he didn't.

Anyway, I think that overall he did more than OK for us and I won't spend too much time dwelling on wether or not he did this and that, all managers do stuff differently and we'll all have a different view on it. Mine might well be a load of bollocks though TBF :D

Overall, the guy is a legend, sadly it went wrong, probably due to a number of factors most of which we've all named but we'll never truly have the truth on.

Thank you for reading me, my names A&C, goodnight.
This is the ITK thread. Take it to the Poch thread or A&C might have your sack.
 

pablo73

Well-Known Member
Dec 6, 2006
3,979
13,596
I think the idea of Poch promoting youth is seen differently at club/professional level than it is by us. He gave enough of them a taste of first team football no matter how fleeting and for a young footballer that's a no small thing. Even being in the squad or travelling to games would be a fantastic learning experience for many of them. For us, it's so what he didn't get much game time and that's about it.

The way I look at it is if they were good enough, they'd have been picked more often. I don't care how many actually made the breakthrough, Poch gave young footballers a chance IMO, its not exclusive to promoting from within. There seems to be this acceptance that he had to 'discover' them or be the first one to have picked them and I don't feel that way either, IIRC (and I may well be wrong here) we had one of the youngest, if not the youngest team in the Premier League competing at the very highest level and that's no mean achievement, no matter who was responsible for discovering them, signing them or feeding them on Farley Rusks. He took a bunch of young footballers and made them into a top team. IMO that's where he got his reputation from.

There's also another factor. As we got more and more 'successful' it became harder to do. It's much more difficult to take someone from the youth team and give them as lot of game time. Had he done so and not got results you can bet both your bollocks we'd have been on his case for not taking it seriously, picking the wrong team and all the rest of it. Could he have done that a bit more? Probably but I really don't think we missed out on the next big thing because he didn't.

Anyway, I think that overall he did more than OK for us and I won't spend too much time dwelling on wether or not he did this and that, all managers do stuff differently and we'll all have a different view on it. Mine might well be a load of bollocks though TBF :D

Overall, the guy is a legend, sadly it went wrong, probably due to a number of factors most of which we've all named but we'll never truly have the truth on.

Thank you for reading me, my names A&C, goodnight.

I agree with pretty much all of that but at the same time if the youth players weren't quite good enough to make the first team squad they should have been loaned out to gain experience and see if they could hack it in competitive football.

I love Poch but he has a stubborn streak a mile wide and refusing to allow more young players to go out on loan was a major oversight IMHO.
 

stonebrow

Well-Known Member
Jun 28, 2012
1,014
2,738
I think the idea of Poch promoting youth is seen differently at club/professional level than it is by us. He gave enough of them a taste of first team football no matter how fleeting and for a young footballer that's a no small thing. Even being in the squad or travelling to games would be a fantastic learning experience for many of them. For us, it's so what he didn't get much game time and that's about it.

The way I look at it is if they were good enough, they'd have been picked more often. I don't care how many actually made the breakthrough, Poch gave young footballers a chance IMO, its not exclusive to promoting from within. There seems to be this acceptance that he had to 'discover' them or be the first one to have picked them and I don't feel that way either, IIRC (and I may well be wrong here) we had one of the youngest, if not the youngest team in the Premier League competing at the very highest level and that's no mean achievement, no matter who was responsible for discovering them, signing them or feeding them on Farley Rusks. He took a bunch of young footballers and made them into a top team. IMO that's where he got his reputation from.

There's also another factor. As we got more and more 'successful' it became harder to do. It's much more difficult to take someone from the youth team and give them as lot of game time. Had he done so and not got results you can bet both your bollocks we'd have been on his case for not taking it seriously, picking the wrong team and all the rest of it. Could he have done that a bit more? Probably but I really don't think we missed out on the next big thing because he didn't.

Anyway, I think that overall he did more than OK for us and I won't spend too much time dwelling on wether or not he did this and that, all managers do stuff differently and we'll all have a different view on it. Mine might well be a load of bollocks though TBF :D

Overall, the guy is a legend, sadly it went wrong, probably due to a number of factors most of which we've all named but we'll never truly have the truth on.

Thank you for reading me, my names A&C, goodnight.
No, did well but didn’t do anything to warrant being called a legend
 

doctor stefan Freud

the tired tread of sad biology
Sep 2, 2013
15,170
72,169
I think the idea of Poch promoting youth is seen differently at club/professional level than it is by us. He gave enough of them a taste of first team football no matter how fleeting and for a young footballer that's a no small thing. Even being in the squad or travelling to games would be a fantastic learning experience for many of them. For us, it's so what he didn't get much game time and that's about it.

The way I look at it is if they were good enough, they'd have been picked more often. I don't care how many actually made the breakthrough, Poch gave young footballers a chance IMO, its not exclusive to promoting from within. There seems to be this acceptance that he had to 'discover' them or be the first one to have picked them and I don't feel that way either, IIRC (and I may well be wrong here) we had one of the youngest, if not the youngest team in the Premier League competing at the very highest level and that's no mean achievement, no matter who was responsible for discovering them, signing them or feeding them on Farley Rusks. He took a bunch of young footballers and made them into a top team. IMO that's where he got his reputation from.

There's also another factor. As we got more and more 'successful' it became harder to do. It's much more difficult to take someone from the youth team and give them as lot of game time. Had he done so and not got results you can bet both your bollocks we'd have been on his case for not taking it seriously, picking the wrong team and all the rest of it. Could he have done that a bit more? Probably but I really don't think we missed out on the next big thing because he didn't.

Anyway, I think that overall he did more than OK for us and I won't spend too much time dwelling on wether or not he did this and that, all managers do stuff differently and we'll all have a different view on it. Mine might well be a load of bollocks though TBF :D

Overall, the guy is a legend, sadly it went wrong, probably due to a number of factors most of which we've all named but we'll never truly have the truth on.

Thank you for reading me, my names A&C, goodnight.
Shit, you’re emitting ideas of a sensitive nature I hitherto believed impossible from such a hulking, brute of a man.

I like it
 

sidford

Well-Known Member
Oct 20, 2003
11,368
29,796
No, did well but didn’t do anything to warrant being called a legend

He absolutely should be considered a legend in our history, what he achieved for us was brilliant and was something I wouldn't of dreamed of - the league finishes, CL 4 years in a row, ending numerous hoodoos like Chelsea away etc and it all culminated in that best moments in football for me last season getting to the CL final albeit we all acknowledge we had a lot go our way to get there.

He was not perfect, no manager is, plus I do think he had a big hand in his own downfall but he is the best manager I have seen at spurs (I'm 37) and I will always regard him as a spurs legend.
 

Hoopspur

You have insufficient privileges to reply here!
Jun 28, 2012
6,332
9,703
My whole point earlier yesterday evening was my disappointment there seemingly isn’t a reserve striker ready to step up in a crucial position from the youth. Such an important position. Don’t care who’s fault it is or not.

*And why didn’t we sign Glen Murray or someone like him til the end of the season?
 

wrd

Well-Known Member
Aug 22, 2014
13,603
58,005
I think the idea of Poch promoting youth is seen differently at club/professional level than it is by us. He gave enough of them a taste of first team football no matter how fleeting and for a young footballer that's a no small thing. Even being in the squad or travelling to games would be a fantastic learning experience for many of them. For us, it's so what he didn't get much game time and that's about it.

The way I look at it is if they were good enough, they'd have been picked more often. I don't care how many actually made the breakthrough, Poch gave young footballers a chance IMO, its not exclusive to promoting from within. There seems to be this acceptance that he had to 'discover' them or be the first one to have picked them and I don't feel that way either, IIRC (and I may well be wrong here) we had one of the youngest, if not the youngest team in the Premier League competing at the very highest level and that's no mean achievement, no matter who was responsible for discovering them, signing them or feeding them on Farley Rusks. He took a bunch of young footballers and made them into a top team. IMO that's where he got his reputation from.

There's also another factor. As we got more and more 'successful' it became harder to do. It's much more difficult to take someone from the youth team and give them as lot of game time. Had he done so and not got results you can bet both your bollocks we'd have been on his case for not taking it seriously, picking the wrong team and all the rest of it. Could he have done that a bit more? Probably but I really don't think we missed out on the next big thing because he didn't.

Anyway, I think that overall he did more than OK for us and I won't spend too much time dwelling on wether or not he did this and that, all managers do stuff differently and we'll all have a different view on it. Mine might well be a load of bollocks though TBF :D

Overall, the guy is a legend, sadly it went wrong, probably due to a number of factors most of which we've all named but we'll never truly have the truth on.

Thank you for reading me, my names A&C, goodnight.

My view too, the only part imo he got wrong was when taking the special youth and getting them involved in training with the first team, he let too many of them live too long in limbo of not playing youth games but also not getting minutes and he removed that bridge off the loan elsewhere. In hindsight I think he should have had a set time of maybe 6 months- 1 year where if he felt they weren't going to get minutes then choosing an appropriate loan to bridge that gap.

I understood his logic at the time of keeping them developing in our ethos but we saw a couple of the most promising players like KWP and Onomah suffer and the fact that they are the only 2 of the 11 who won that youth world cup not playing regularly either in the prem or bundesliga over the past 18 months does make it look worse imo.
 

lincspurs

Well-Known Member
Jan 19, 2011
690
1,330
I understood his logic at the time of keeping them developing in our ethos but we saw a couple of the most promising players like KWP and Onomah suffer and the fact that they are the only 2 of the 11 who won that youth world cup not playing regularly either in the prem or bundesliga over the past 18 months does make it look worse imo.
Wasn’t aware of that but does appear quite damming. To happen to one of them is unfortunate but to happen to both??????
 

dondo

Well-Known Member
Jan 4, 2006
8,603
14,091
Tanganga is a centre back long term I imagine but he could end up a far better centre back for having 18 months playing fairly often as a right back, it will help him learn a lot about the way teams construct attacks and how to defend them, while also ensuring he gets regular football.

It’s a good way for Tanganga to gain experience in a easier role similar to how Carragher and Terry did when they first came in
 

Archibald&Crooks

Aegina Expat
Admin
Feb 1, 2005
55,585
205,046
See this is another thing I'm not entirely sure I agree on, the need for him to loan out players or indeed that he's entirely responsible for not doing so. This is again one of those things we decide upon without knowing the facts. Do we know who is actually responsible for youth development? What input does he have on deciding who goes out on loan. Who decides when a player is ready for that. I feel the balance of probability is that Poch would be guided by those who know the player best. That they'd have a chat about certain players and decide how to proceed from there. It's not all 'on Poch' as people used to like to say.

Is a player ready to go out on loan
Would a player benefit more from being around the squad/training with the first team etc etc
Can we actually find that player a suitable club
If we can, does that club want to take him, does that player want to go there

For sure there are instances where we can't understand why this or that player didn't get farmed out but we don't know the inside story enough to make a definitive judgement on it, certainly not enough to blame it on Pochettino. IMO if we asked the question of someone who knows the full story and actually got an answer, we'd look at it and go ""oh yeah, makes sense I suppose". At the end of the day, some players go out on loan, some don't......

We all know about Urban Legends right? IMO there's a lot of 'Spurban Legends" floating around SC, people say stuff often enough and it becomes fact. This player sulks (he doesn't), that player is too big for his boots because he points (He's not) and so on........I think this youth thing, in the grand scheme of Poch's tenure isn't a massive deal but it's seemingly become one. No idea why but for me........spurban legend.

*Reads the above

Fucking hell, I don't know what's happening to me, it must be that osmosis thing again :D
 

wrd

Well-Known Member
Aug 22, 2014
13,603
58,005
See this is another thing I'm not entirely sure I agree on, the need for him to loan out players or indeed that he's entirely responsible for not doing so. This is again one of those things we decide upon without knowing the facts. Do we know who is actually responsible for youth development? What input does he have on deciding who goes out on loan. Who decides when a player is ready for that. I feel the balance of probability is that Poch would be guided by those who know the player best. That they'd have a chat about certain players and decide how to proceed from there. It's not all 'on Poch' as people used to like to say.

Is a player ready to go out on loan
Would a player benefit more from being around the squad/training with the first team etc etc
Can we actually find that player a suitable club
If we can, does that club want to take him, does that player want to go there

For sure there are instances where we can't understand why this or that player didn't get farmed out but we don't know the inside story enough to make a definitive judgement on it, certainly not enough to blame it on Pochettino. IMO if we asked the question of someone who knows the full story and actually got an answer, we'd look at it and go ""oh yeah, makes sense I suppose". At the end of the day, some players go out on loan, some don't......

We all know about Urban Legends right? IMO there's a lot of 'Spurban Legends" floating around SC, people say stuff often enough and it becomes fact. This player sulks (he doesn't), that player is too big for his boots because he points (He's not) and so on........I think this youth thing, in the grand scheme of Poch's tenure isn't a massive deal but it's seemingly become one. No idea why but for me........spurban legend.

*Reads the above

Fucking hell, I don't know what's happening to me, it must be that osmosis thing again :D

I'd link you an article if I wouldn't get banned but if you google pochettino prefers to have talent at home not on loan - the article in the guardian has quotes where he discusses that it is his preference that they stay.

I agree with you that I do think it's one of those things that was blown way out of proportion on here where people are suggesting he ruined their careers or what not, Im of the mentality that the cream always rises to the top and I do think his overall use of young players warrants his reputation as an excellent coach for developing youth but if there was 1 blot on his copybook I'd say it was the stagnation of a few players through lack of loans which appears to have been his choice judging by his own words.
 

wrd

Well-Known Member
Aug 22, 2014
13,603
58,005
This is where I find out the expression blot on your copybook doesn't mean one small mistake which doesn't outweigh the vast amount of good:LOL:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top