- Jul 23, 2013
- 6,904
- 16,005
Can't say I'm blown away by this link. Has he even been involved at Chelsea this season?!
Good point to them having 3 strikers to our 1. I agree us signing him is better than signing no one, but surely we can find someone better than this washed up London journeyman. (I can't imagine Chelsea selling to us anyways)I'm sure we'd take Tammy Abraham and Batshuayi over him every day of the week though. If Mourinho wants to employ a true number 9 then we've got precisely no one.
Can't say I'm blown away by this link. Has he even been involved at Chelsea this season?!
They are stringing us along so that we can't focus on other targetsThink this’ll go absolutely fucking nowhere. Chelsea will sell to us when pigs fly
Can't say I'm blown away by this link. Has he even been involved at Chelsea this season?!
In respect of your opinion Herc, he's way past his prime for me IMO. 33 years old. I think he would be a decent plan B in game option and an occasional starter to rest a fit Kane, but I am under the impression that we are aiming to sign a ST that will start for us for the rest of the season in Kane's absence. Could he do that effectively in 3 competitions when he's played 200 minutes in all comps this season? Llorente struggled to that for us at his age, but I rated him as a substitute option. But I'd like to think Mourinho has a better gauge on player than me.Which F’ng part of him is washed up? Don’t read into this as we done a deal! Just a question in general. I won’t get involved in exchanges ?
Which F’ng part of him is washed up? Don’t read into this as we done a deal! Just a question in general. I won’t get involved in exchanges ?
Yea I agree and Think he’s a better player and ideal than piaetek who could easily fail but he’s 33 now, has he got it in him to say play 90 mins twice a week? (Probably does as for his style of play 33 is ok but he’d be a pretty short term solution, I’d rather we signed a day 25 yr old we can get behind who will be part of our present and future not just sticking around for a season or 2.Would personally quite like this (more so than Piatek) but I can’t see Chelsea allowing it.
33 years old and has scored 2 league goals past 2 seasons. Doesn't fill me with confidence at all.Which F’ng part of him is washed up? Don’t read into this as we done a deal! Just a question in general. I won’t get involved in exchanges ?
Yea I agree and Think he’s a better player and ideal than piaetek who could easily fail but he’s 33 now, has he got it in him to say play 90 mins twice a week? (Probably does as for his style of play 33 is ok but he’d be a pretty short term solution, I’d rather we signed a day 25 yr old we can get behind who will be part of our present and future not just sticking around for a season or 2.
Yea I remember being in away end at the goons game, we were winning and he came on and they were crossing it left right and centre and we started shittingn ourselves, sure enough he scored soon after and I think we drew or lost the game but I remember thinking he’s such a threat up there.To be fair I think Arsenal’s demise started when they sold this guy. He was their plan B to rescue matches that weren’t going their way and when he was sold they started losing / drawing home matches against far inferior opponents. As a short term Kane back up I would’ve be against it
Yep, that’s why I think Giroud would work.Maybe we see Parrott as Kane backup in 18 months or so.