What's new

The Daily ITK Discussion Thread - The there's been some ITK Edition 15th July 2013

Status
Not open for further replies.

EnfieldYiddo

Silence
Aug 6, 2012
15,505
26,871
I think we should buy 2 belgium players Benteke and Mirallas. Mirallas come to Everton for about 6M and we could have him for 12-14M a player that can play on both sides and could be a player that we could rotate a bit with and a very good player aswell. And benteke is the first choice for me as striker. 13M for Mirallas and 21M for Benteke. What do you think ?

You know this how?
 

theShiznit

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2004
17,869
23,921
So in principle a deal is done (for Benteke) just not with Aston Villa?


Does this mean Franco and DL improvise deal sketches in their offices?

Can see them Chest bumping when the (mock) deal is completed for £8.50 while the Gillette the best a man can get music fills the air...
 

Mr Pink

SC Supporter
Aug 25, 2010
55,024
100,046
I think its more likely to be 20 million plus add ons. I'm sure it will be reported as near 25 million if we get him though.
 

Mr Pink

SC Supporter
Aug 25, 2010
55,024
100,046
So in principle a deal is done (for Benteke) just not with Aston Villa?


Does this mean Franco and DL improvise deal sketches in their offices?

Can see them Chest bumping when the (mock) deal is completed for £8.50 while the Gillette the best a man can get music fills the air...

Could read it that way. Although I would say its with Villa - as a deal with Benteke would of been the easy part, probably just haggling over the way the payments are structured and the detail concerning the add ons. Wouldn't surprise me if Villa try to insert some sort of sell on fee as well which I could see taking a while to agree.
 

beats1

Well-Known Member
Feb 22, 2010
30,013
29,561
I think we should buy 2 belgium players Benteke and Mirallas. Mirallas come to Everton for about 6M and we could have him for 12-14M a player that can play on both sides and could be a player that we could rotate a bit with and a very good player aswell. And benteke is the first choice for me as striker. 13M for Mirallas and 21M for Benteke. What do you think ?
If we signed Mirallas and he didn't get time ahead of Lennon, Bale and Dempsey(apparently he has experience:rolleyes:). He wouldn't be able to develop like he has and he wouldn't be a huge sucess

Now that we have fucking strong 11, another factor comes in to play in regards of signings and that is timing. We buy the player at the right stage in their career which gets insanely hard when on a budget
 

panoma

Well-Known Member
Jan 16, 2012
3,911
12,214
Prob around the 20 mill mark for benteke. He handed in a transfer request so gave up a few mill in loyalty bonuses (on villatalk they claim its between 3-4.5 mill), and that plus our 20 would make it almost 25.

Wouldnt suprise me if someone told him/his agent that we can only afford him if he give up his bonuses so villa can accept a lower bid and still making the same profit.
 

Misfit

President of The Niles Crane Fanclub
May 7, 2006
21,212
34,777
Prob around the 20 mill mark for benteke. He handed in a transfer request so gave up a few mill in loyalty bonuses (on villatalk they claim its between 3-4.5 mill), and that plus our 20 would make it almost 25.

Wouldnt suprise me if someone told him/his agent that we can only afford him if he give up his bonuses so villa can accept a lower bid and still making the same profit.

Well, even considering his hike in wages should he join us, that's a fair whack to just be willing to forego to get the move. At least he's not as greedy as most, which for a footballer makes him eligible for a Nobel Peace Prize I think.
 

beats1

Well-Known Member
Feb 22, 2010
30,013
29,561
The fact this deal has gone through relatively quickly from what ITK tells us makes me think there may be one or two going the other way

I know a lot of them suggest that their our scraps wont get in to their team but Naughton, Livermore and Dempsey would improve them.
 

spurs9

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
11,888
34,299
The fact this deal has gone through relatively quickly from what ITK tells us makes me think there may be one or two going the other way

I know a lot of them suggest that their our scraps wont get in to their team but Naughton, Livermore and Dempsey would improve them.

I would have though players being included in the deal would delay things not put it through quicker. Both teams would have to negotiate the worth of the player(s) in question, then Villa would have to talk to the players and come to an agreement.
 

JJetset

Lurking in the shadows of threads...
Oct 4, 2004
3,117
30,679
A cash injection from Joe Lewis just doesn't match his MO to me. In all the time ENIC have owned the club we've lived within our means, and he's left Levy to run it as business. His history suggests someone who only wants to accumulate cash not spend it.

If we are going to splurge cash, I can only see the extra cash coming from the TV deal money.
Normally you are right however in certain instances he will jump in. When we pursued Hazard was 1 occasion.
Wish he would do it more.

Ps BC you are a **** too xxx
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top