What's new

Twente (H) Ten man Spurs thrill in Europe

BringBack_leGin

Well-Known Member
Jul 28, 2004
27,719
54,929
Spurs fans will lament the fact that they've spent so long outside of Europe's premier competition, but on this evidence, they should not be alone . If ever there was a side made for thrilling European nights, it is Tottenham Hotspur. The stadium, atmospheric and electric once full (a fire alarm meant that half of the North stand remained empty for the opening few minutes of the match), was served up a match fittingly entertaining, a match filled with goals, drama, superb football and contraversy by the bucketload. With four exhilarating games played in this seasons competition, Spurs have already notched up twelve goals and provided some mouth watering moments; any neutral should hope for their league form to pick up sufficiently that they might appear one this stage again next season.

Determined to bounce back from recent disappointments, Spurs signalled their intent early on with the superb Gareth Bale volleying Van der Vaart's clever release into the area, only for Crouch to react slower than goalkeeper Mihaylov. Up at the other end, Twente saw Ladzaat's strike blocked by Bassong. The game was open and the match would continue in this fashion, both sides fashioning chances. Bale continued to probe but it was Hutton and Huddlestone who combined to produce Spurs next real chance, from which Pavlyuchenko dragged his shot wide.

Soon after, Gomes had his closest shave of the match when faced one on one with Ruiz after a mix up between Van der Vaart and Huddlestone, but the returning Brazilian goalkeeper was more than up to the challenge and palmed the ensuing shot away brilliantly. Following this, Spurs really began to dominate, Bale continuing to put the crosses in, and the Spurs strikers continuing to be beaten to them by Twente's goalie and defence, while Van der Vaart's right foot shot was saved in style by Twente's Bulgarian shot stopper. Further warning of the Dutchman's potential to unlock the stalemate was provided when he took a knockdown from Crouch with his back for goal and volleyed a crisp but straight shot into the arms Mihaylov.

Spurs thought they had reward for their dominance in the 38th minute when awarded a clear penalty after Crouch was manhandled to the ground by Wisgerhof. What ensued was farcical though, with Mihaylov refusing to take his place between the sticks until into the fortieth minute, earning himself a caution. It seemed to work though, as Van der Vaart's penalty, though placed just inside the post, was not well hit or disguised, leaving Twente's number 1 to make a good save. One might question, however, why the penalty was not retaken when the goalkeeper had strayed so far off his line, and several of the Dutch defence encroached the area as the kick was taken. Frustration seemed to get the better of the Spurs playmaker, as he was booked soon after for a robust challenge, though how the referee knew to book him is questionable when he wasn't facing the incident. Kuipers exaggerated rolling might well have played a part.

The fantastic Dutchman was involved again as the half drew to the close, latching on to Ekotto's long pass with some style and hitting a stinging volley which was well saved by Mihaylov. An action packed first half was brought to an end by the referee, and one wondered if, regardless of goals, the second half would provide the same entertainment value. That question was answered within a minute of the restart.

Spurs went straight on the attack in the second half, and when Huddlestone played the ball up to Crouch, his knock down was taken on the chest by Van der Vaart, who more than made up for his penalty miss with a pirouette and volley that flew into the net and gave Spurs a deserved lead.

Just minutes had passed when Spurs went on the rampage again, this time Gareth Bale set free in the Twente area. Scythed down, Spurs had another blatant penalty and one had to wonder how the offending defender escaped without caution, just as Wisgerhof had in the first half. New penalty taker Pavlyuchenko, poor until now it must be said, sent the goalkeeper the wrong way with a powerful penalty and gave Spurs a comfortable 2-0 lead.

Twente responded well and began to keep the ball and put some pressure on the Spurs backline, and when Spurs failed to clear a free kick in the 55th minute, substitute Chadlie halved the deficit amidst the confusion. The signs were there for a comeback similar to that of Werder Bremen in Spurs opening game, with the North Londoners beginning to struggle and Twente piling on the pressure. Then, with half an hour to go, Van der Vaart seemingly undid all his earlier good work with a moment of madness. Already booked, a player of his experience and class shouldn't rashly challenge an opponent in mid air at full speed, but that's just what he did and he received his second yellow card as a result. He'll certainly be missed in Milan.

Just when it seemed that Twente had their route back into the match mapped out for them, there was another twist in the tale. Pavlyuchenko, improved since his goal, picked the ball up outside the Twente area and unleashed a fierce drive. Kuiper jumped to block the ball, and struck it with his lifted elbow. There might not have been intention, but it was a silly mistake when he could have kept his arms down and let the ball hit him directly, so for all the cries of poor refereeing in this isntance, Kuiper will know deep down that it was his fault. The penalty was again taken by Spurs Russian marksman, and he cheekily chipped to the side of a leaden footed Mihaylov, cool as anything and restoring Spurs to a comfortable two goal lead.

Twente didn't give up, and for a while they put pressure on ten man Spurs, but a combination of calm defending and a commanding goalkeeper meant that the Dutch champions never really fashioned anything beyond half chances, and after freshening things up with the introduction of Keane, Jenas and Lennon, Spurs again took control and kept possession well. Twente's heads dropped, and in the 84th minute a lazy header from Douglas ended up at the feet of the Gareth Bale. Twente now became the latest side to find out how dangerous it is to allow this boy any possession, as the Welsh winger raced into their area and slotted home Spurs 4th goal with all the composure of a seasoned centre forward, capping off his own great performance.

Some might argue that Spurs were fortunate today, after all, they had fewer goal attempts, were awarded three penalties and could have been a man down far earlier had the referee interpreted Huddlestones shrugging off of his assailant as something more sinister, but not me. I think Spurs deserved both the win and the margin by which they won. While Twente were concentrating more on trying to wind up their opponents, as well as the referee, Spurs were playing, fast, attractive football and could have won the game by half time with some fortune and livelier strikers. European nights have well and truly returned to White Hart Lane, and long may they stay there as Spurs again establish themselves as one of Europe's great entertainers.

BBLG's Spurs man of the Match: Tom Huddlestone, and not just because Van der Vaart was sent off. He overcame a slow start to defend superbly, make many blocks and hit some wonderful passes.

BBLG's moment of the Match: Has to be a sublime opener from Rafael Van der Vaart, a simply brilliant goal.
 

JimmyG2

SC Supporter
Dec 7, 2006
15,014
20,779
'any neutral should hope for their league form to pick up sufficiently that they might appear on this stage again next season.'

I think that this from your opening paragraph is a crucial point.
We haven't had that many reasons to feel pride over the last couple of decades and we might be back in the wilderness again if our league form doesn't build on this boost.
Think your rose tinted glasses make all the penalties nailed on but on another night we might not have got any of them particularly the first where such tussles in the box are routinely ignored.
Not even sure that Crouch wasn't the first offender.

Good report but think the contribution of Modric just shades Huddlestone who only switched on in the second half.

Tribute to the boys who made the absence of VdeV barely noticeable.
 

BringBack_leGin

Well-Known Member
Jul 28, 2004
27,719
54,929
I think my biased here was in overload because of how OTT the media have been about our fortune. I guarantee that if Rooney had been wrestled down instead of Crouch , it would have been 'refreshing to see one of those go for a forward for once', if Giggs had been scythed down instead of Bale, we'd have heard about how defenders can't go to ground in the box unless they're certain, and if Scholes had a bullet hit an arm instead of Pav, it would have been 'if you raise your arms in the area you're asking for trouble'.
 

beuller

Well-Known Member
May 10, 2005
1,533
2,353
This game is all about opinions. Never a truer word said.

Although Huddlestone improved in the second half, he was far from our best player for me. And without doubt, he should have walked for the flailing arm.

Having now re-seen all the penalties I feel we were fortunate to get any of them to be honest. Although to be fair to the officials I can see why he gave the first 2.

Was lovely to see Modders back in the centre. His ball retention is incredible. And invaluable.

Well done to Pav for scoring the pressure penalties. But, from being a firm defender of the obviously talented Russian, I am becoming a frustrated neutral. Why did it take 2 goals for his touch get better. It was agricultural to say the least in the first half. He was at times a willing channel runner on Weds but ball retention was no-where near good enough at times.

With Crouch and Pav up front our mobility was really poor. Having only Keane on the bench to replace either was depressing.

A good win.

But one that has papered over some rather worrying cracks in my opinion.

Edit: My post is a bit negative, sorry. I'm just really worried about where our goals are coming from right now.
 

doom

Well-Known Member
Dec 13, 2003
2,368
1,338
I completely agree with your analysis of the game. I also believe the penalties were correct decisions. Kuipers hand ball could have been avoided and you can see he has sight of the ball even though his back was turned. The ref did not protect our players at all in the first half, for instance Pav was constantly hacked as he tried to hold up play. All in all we dominated big chunks of the game and our possession play was excellent even when down to 10 men.
 

gloryglory

Well-Known Member
Oct 19, 2004
1,537
302
I think the third penalty was harsh, and the first one - although I think it was a penalty - is a type of foul that is often not given. I cannot though for the life of me understand how anybody is arguing with the second one.

Overall we had the rub of the green with decisions, that's pretty unarguable when you factor in the Huddlestone elbow. He's probably my favourite player these days, but you can't be man of the match when you do your best to get sent off. See also - Van der Vaart, R.

Modric was brilliant and the team performance in general was top notch - but man of the match has to be Bale. He was the difference time and again.

Lastly, on Pavlyuchenko - until he took those penalties, I honestly was never sure if he considers himself right or left footed. And not because he's so good with both ...
 

JoeT

Well-Known Member
Jun 7, 2005
3,813
935
I agree that Spur's win tended to be partly dismissed by the media as being due to the 'unlucky' Kuiper penalty...as if the whole game turned on that incident, when we know it didn't. The media over here tended to show the same bias, with most of the other aspects of the game largely ignored. However I'm not so sure that writing a 'report' with an opposite bias in "overload" addresses that concern.
That third penalty was harsh i.m.o. and if it had been our defender who had been on the receiving end there would have been hell to play on here. I do agree that the first two penalties should have been given though.
Fun reading 'B.B.LG'
 

spud

Well-Known Member
Sep 2, 2003
5,850
8,794
I think the third penalty was harsh, and the first one - although I think it was a penalty - is a type of foul that is often not given. I cannot though for the life of me understand how anybody is arguing with the second one.

It's pretty simple really: Bale tumbled to the floor without being touched, and - although this irrelevant - I don't believe the defender touched him after he went down either. Contact doesn't mean it's automatically a foul, but there was no contact. There was no foul. It was a dive. Bale cheated and got away with it.

The fact that the defender 'went to ground', 'made a rash challenge' or 'lunged' is also irrelevant. If he didn't foul Bale - and without any contact he could not possibly have done so - it isn't a penalty.

As I said, pretty simple really.
 

Kingstheman

No longer BSoDL
Mar 13, 2006
5,831
2,991
It was a baffling, bewildering, strange game (mainly due to several events) - making the match eventful - rather than bland and without incident.

I am glad that Tottenham won, but there was just a strange feeling after that game.
 
Top