- Feb 20, 2005
- 836
- 809
Last edited by a moderator:
Who gives a fuck what rose does...if he doesnt like it fuck off back to sunderland !!!! He aint even good enough to be sulking, knuckle down and improve your game and prove your worth in our SQUAD.Rumours today of Rose sulking, not a good sign. Just got one HG quota LB in, if we lose another, it's back to square one, albeit with an upgrade.
Rumours today of Rose sulking, not a good sign. Just got one HG quota LB in, if we lose another, it's back to square one, albeit with an upgrade.
Yes, fryers looks solid on the LBfryers then. we don't need sulkers
We need two left backs, one to start and one in the squad. Last year that should have been Rose and Benny but it ended up being Rose and Vertonghen or Naughton - one area that didn't work well when Danny got injured. I'm guessing we won't see Benny again so I'd like Rose to stay around.Who gives a fuck what rose does...if he doesnt like it fuck off back to sunderland !!!! He aint even good enough to be sulking, knuckle down and improve your game and prove your worth in our SQUAD.
(Cue davies picking up a 4 mth injury)
Bollox
If we go after another CB - and we still really need one - Fryers could be used as cover...yes?Rumours today of Rose sulking, not a good sign. Just got one HG quota LB in, if we lose another, it's back to square one, albeit with an upgrade.
I'm sorry ? Not good at attacking only defending ?
I would say the best part of rose game is attacking and I thought instantly Davies looked more intelligent with what to do with the ball ... Played some balls in short and some longer...
This article is not great from the guardian
Yeah that jogging back bit frustrates me, if it wasn't for that he wouldn't be half as bad as he is... He just seems to give up, or lose track of the fact that he's a LB not a LWI tend to agree with this But,
I'd say Rose is more attacking in the sense that he bombs down the line like a headless chicken in a role that nearly makes him a second left winger. This of course meant so often he was caught out and you could see him 'jogging' back to get into position. Davies is a more traditional mould, that still considers his defensive duties (which i think is great).
BUT, you are definitely right, Davies looked far more intelligent and played a nice mixture of short and long balls, even if a few first time passes, I loved the one he cut into the box for Lamela's near miss early in the first half. Whilst Rose is more 'rangey' Davies will be a far more useful offensive weapon because he plays with intelligent and plays clever offensive passes into dangerous areas.
2 wordsWe need two left backs, one to start and one in the squad. Last year that should have been Rose and Benny but it ended up being Rose and Vertonghen or Naughton - one area that didn't work well when Danny got injured. I'm guessing we won't see Benny again so I'd like Rose to stay around.
Give Ben squad number 11