- Aug 18, 2017
- 518
- 1,113
What is it? Can't view the attachment.
Can't see it, what does it say?
sorry try this one
What is it? Can't view the attachment.
Can't see it, what does it say?
sorry try this one
yea i wouldn't be surprised if it was just terrible product design but I dont know why "stadium" would be in the title at all to be honest.Very odd they would accidentally let that slip.
iirc stadium is just the name of the 'cheap 'replica version of the kit, then theres another name that escapes me for the actual shirt/shorts the players wear, that you can also buy, but are more expensive
iirc stadium is just the name of the 'cheap 'replica version of the kit, then theres another name that escapes me for the actual shirt/shorts the players wear, that you can also buy, but are more expensive
On the other hand, they are making so much money each year, that £20m is nothing to them. Also imagine the esports possibilities of a Fifa Tournament at the EA Stadium each year.... It's definitely something I could see their marketing execs being in to.It strongly doubt EA would see any value in investing a naming rights deal with Spurs. By comparison to EA the club is small time in terms of reach, brand awareness and engagement.
Look at it another way, what percentage of EA’s target audience has access to Premier League, Champions league or NFL but doesn’t know about FIFA or Madden? That number is so small that paying mid 8 figures per year to reach these people would be sheer idiocy.
Barca apparently close to a £355m, 20 year deal for naming rights...
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/7840649/barcelona-nou-camp-rename-355m-deal/
That would suggest, even with London being more an entertainment hub than Barcelona, and the NFL tie-up, that Levy won’t get anywhere close to that.
On the other hand, they are making so much money each year, that £20m is nothing to them. Also imagine the esports possibilities of a Fifa Tournament at the EA Stadium each year.... It's definitely something I could see their marketing execs being in to.
It's not about location. It's a global sport and companies pay a premium to be attached to winners. Sadly we're not there yet.
There is advertising, getting your name recognised but then you have your name being associated with being the best. Which is another level.
Which is where Barca are different. They are apparently being sponsored by a local pharma company- (ironic when you think about the rumours about PEDS in Spain). They could easily get more money from Qatar or a large sports brand, but they aren't all about the money.
Just a thought, that we have a good owner who acts in the interest of the club. How many times would there have been a "no confidence" vote in Levy before now? (Theresa May faces vote today)Nope their president is voted for by the members. This is more political than greed.
Good point. The thing is I think he would have been voted out as most fans are either impatient, blinkered, fickle or all threeJust a thought, that we have a good owner who acts in the interest of the club. How many times would there have been a "no confidence" vote in Levy before now? (Theresa May faces vote today)
Thats only 17M a year though.Barca apparently close to a £355m, 20 year deal for naming rights...
https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/football/7840649/barcelona-nou-camp-rename-355m-deal/
That would suggest, even with London being more an entertainment hub than Barcelona, and the NFL tie-up, that Levy won’t get anywhere close to that.
Sounds to me that they are choosing one or more from several respectable categories to get ideas. The good thing is that we don't see any middle Eastern airlines or oil companies in your list. Was there anything like that ?Anyone else received the survey request from the club, looking for views on sponsors?
Could the list of companies provide a clue as to who we are in talks with over naming rights? (FYI the companies in the survey included Audi, Ford, Mercedes, AIA, Nike, Addidas, Rolex, Tag Haeur, Heineken).