The Daily ITK Discussion Thread 6th August

[luptic]

We have alot of loose ends to tie, if we want players in, given the fact ones need to leave as well.

 

[DaniLeves]

If you say someone has come in for him then you are raising the possibility of a transfer, and therefore of him leaving, no? Seemed like an obvious inference to me. *shrug*

Clearly we’ve seen in this TW theres a massive difference between ‘approach made’ and ‘done deal’

 

[gazzeh]

Kovacic would be our best signing for years. Until we sign Martial ha.

 

[Dan Stallworthy]

I suppose it will be a nice change if its a busy deadline day. After all, every deadline day we all moan if there's nothing happening

 

[George94]

I mean you're all welcome to get excited about Kovacic, but I definitely wouldn't qualify Hertyid's comments as 'ITK' that we're in for him...

 

[MyNameIsNicolaBerti]

Clearly we’ve seen in this TW theres a massive difference between ‘approach made’ and ‘done deal’

Yes, but I never claimed it was a done deal. *shrug*

 

[DaniLeves]

Yes, but I never claimed it was a done deal. *shrug*

If you’re going to backpedal everything you say then why say it at all? *shrug*

 

[Trix]

If you say someone has come in for him then you are raising the possibility of a transfer, and therefore of him leaving, no? Seemed like an obvious inference to me. *shrug*

A club showing an interest does not mean.....

He is for sale
He wants to go to them
They will pay what we want for him
They will pay what he wants in wages


All it means is there is a club interested in him and have made contact. Now if you want to take a straight forward piece of information and then take it three steps into the future in your head that's fine, but when you start posting ITK says he's leaving it's just not the case and one of the reasons the place goes into melt down, when things don't pan out that way.

 

[wee_spur]

Im not sure you can class not buying or selling anyone as "mayhem"

 

[Phomesy]

A club showing an interest does not mean.....

He is for sale
He wants to go to them
They will pay what we want for him
They will pay what he wants in wages


All it means is there is a club interested in him and have made contact. Now if you want to take a straight forward piece of information and then take it three steps into the future in your head that's fine, but when you start posting ITK says he's leaving it's just not the case and one of the reasons the place goes into melt down, when things don't pan out that way.

That's a very good point.

It's also one that could possibly have been made to the dozens of posts celebrating Sissoko's imminent departure prior to NicolaBerti saying his piece?

Either way - it's interesting ITK and if it means we are one step closer to making the deals we want to then I think we all can agree that's good news

 

[Trix]

That's a very good point.

It's also one that could possibly have been made to the dozens of posts celebrating Sissoko's imminent departure prior to NicolaBerti saying his piece?

Either way - it's interesting ITK and if it means we are one step closer to making the deals we want to then I think we all can agree that's good news

Of course, but I was responding to a post of his where he was defending what he had posted by saying the ITK said he was leaving, which it certainly did not. it just said there was club interested in him.

 

[keeole]

Where has Jay Rodriguez rumour come from? Maybe the wrong Rodriguez ?

 

[ravo]

I suppose it will be a nice change if its a busy deadline day. After all, every deadline day we all moan if there's nothing happening

It's kinda like Levy is sponsored by Sky Sports Deadline Day Special.

 

[Long Lost]

Where has Jay Rodriguez rumour come from? Maybe the wrong Rodriguez ?

It was a tenuous link in the local Burnley paper I think (naming us as one of 6 clubs interested). Luckily we don’t have to worry about it now with two ITKs ruling it out ??

 

[Long Lost]

I guess Gards info in twitter is ok here ?

Only JJ twitter allowed in here, I’d remove this

 

[LexingtonSpurs]

I guess Gards info in twitter is ok here ?

Stick in Lobotka and/or Grealish threads

 

[arunspurs]

Only JJ twitter allowed in here, I’d remove this

Thanks guys...removed it. Just realised rules been changed. Remember Gards twitter was ok sometime back.

 

[Hoopspur]

Not sure replying to the post and including said rule breaking item is sensible either. A little editing would have been prudent. @arunspurs removed his post, yet it still remains in the thread.

 

[Parkie]

It's kinda like Levy is sponsored by Sky Sports Deadline Day Special.

He’s got shares in a company making yellow ties

 

[the lad]

He’s got shares in a company making yellow ties

I wonder do the ties have a release clause ?