What's new

The Cricket Thread

SE Spurs

Well-Known Member
Aug 12, 2018
2,699
4,810
FFS England! 113. I love the way England have gone about the ODI batting, but just occasionally, I'd love em' to just consolidate and work out a good score, if they're 3 or 4 down early. That said, guess they ain't used to batting on pitches, that aren't as flat as pancakes.
 

SE Spurs

Well-Known Member
Aug 12, 2018
2,699
4,810
Rashids a fantastic bowler now in ODIs and T20s. Windies look like they're not to fussed anymore.
 

LeSoupeKitchen

Well-Known Member
Aug 18, 2011
3,106
7,635
More confirmation that the most unpopular man ever in world cricket is coming back. The ****.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/47599698

"There were a lot of big hugs and cuddles," Warner said.

"It's like we didn't really leave, the boys were very accepting of us coming in and with open arms."

Australia coach Justin Langer described the meeting as "like two brothers coming home".

Yeah - because the whole bloody team was in on it!
 

aussiespursguy

Well-Known Member
Mar 21, 2015
3,442
6,696
"There were a lot of big hugs and cuddles," Warner said.

"It's like we didn't really leave, the boys were very accepting of us coming in and with open arms."

Australia coach Justin Langer described the meeting as "like two brothers coming home".

Yeah - because the whole bloody team was in on it!
Fair go. 7 from a squad of 18 in the UAE currently. 2 not even in first team picture at the time. I personally don't believe anyone other than the three were involved.
I don't want Warner anywhere near the team, make no mistake. I'm sure most of us Aussies feel the same. Smith made a huge mistake in his words saying "I don't want anything to do with it". He should have said where the fuck is your head. He deserved his ban and personally back in too quick. But Warner. Never to play again.
 
Last edited:

WorcesterTHFC

Well-Known Member
May 4, 2016
1,783
2,553
Never seen Jos as angry as when he was walking off, and I'm not surprised. Soured the match.
If you're a non-striker and you back up too far, the bowler's entitled to run you out before releasing the ball. All you need to do is to make sure you're safely in your ground when the bowler is about to bowl. Sorry, but I have no sympathy for someone who gets Mankaded. It's their own fault and nobody else's.
 

SE Spurs

Well-Known Member
Aug 12, 2018
2,699
4,810
If you're a non-striker and you back up too far, the bowler's entitled to run you out before releasing the ball. All you need to do is to make sure you're safely in your ground when the bowler is about to bowl. Sorry, but I have no sympathy for someone who gets Mankaded. It's their own fault and nobody else's.


Just ain't cricket though. From what I understand Butler wasn't at least warned, and that ain't right imo. If he'd been warned, then I'd agree, and have no sympathy.
 

WorcesterTHFC

Well-Known Member
May 4, 2016
1,783
2,553
Just ain't cricket though. From what I understand Butler wasn't at least warned, and that ain't right imo. If he'd been warned, then I'd agree, and have no sympathy.
You shouldn't need a warning (which the laws of the game don't require your opponent to give you). If you run the risk of being out of your ground, an opponent is entitled to run you out, and if you get Mankaded, it might teach you to stay in your crease when you're supposed to be there.
 

Arnoldtoo

The thinking ape's ape
May 18, 2006
35,361
55,069
If you're a non-striker and you back up too far, the bowler's entitled to run you out before releasing the ball. All you need to do is to make sure you're safely in your ground when the bowler is about to bowl. Sorry, but I have no sympathy for someone who gets Mankaded. It's their own fault and nobody else's.

I'm aware of the rules.
 

al_pacino

woo
Feb 2, 2005
4,572
4,112
I understand that it isn't the done thing but the game has changed. With the rise of limited overs games the quick single has become much more important and batsman are getting a bit carried away with their backing up, particularly at the business end of an innings. I think it probably needs looking at at an official level and a rule being put in place to stop batsmen leaving the crease until the bowler has released the ball, all controversy should end then .
 

Archibald&Crooks

Aegina Expat
Admin
Feb 1, 2005
55,585
205,047
If you're a non-striker and you back up too far, the bowler's entitled to run you out before releasing the ball. All you need to do is to make sure you're safely in your ground when the bowler is about to bowl. Sorry, but I have no sympathy for someone who gets Mankaded. It's their own fault and nobody else's.
Don't agree with this at all. He wasn't backing up too far and pretty much most of the respected figures in the game don't like what they saw. Without turning this into a back and forth about the spirit of the game, the rules etc etc, this from the BBC slums it up for me.

The laws state that "if the non-striker is out of his/her ground from the moment the ball comes into play to the instant when the bowler would normally have been expected to release the ball, the bowler is permitted to attempt to run him/her out".

Replays showed Buttler was in his ground when Ashwin's foot landed at the crease but then left it before the bowler removed the bails.

And here's a few punditry onions:

England selector and former batsman James Taylor: "Buttler was still in his crease when Ashwin was in his delivery stride! He wasn't trying to gain an advantage! He was literally walking in with the bowler."

Shane Warne: "So disappointed in Ravi Ashwin as a captain and as a person," Warne said. "All captains sign the IPL wall and agree to play in the spirit of the game.

Ashwin: "It wasn't planned or anything like that. It's there within the rules of the game. I don't understand where the spirit of the game comes in."

So for me, the 'backing up too far' argument doesn't hold much weight. Ashwin signed the IPL pledge to play to the spirit of the game and now is denying he even knows what that is. IMO he's dropped himself in the shit and his attempts to deny what he did are embarrassing.
 

mpickard2087

Patient Zero
Jun 13, 2008
21,888
32,552
It was sneaky, it was cynical, but I haven't got a problem with it to be honest. Adds another dimension and potential opportunity for the bowler in a format that is loaded in favour of the batsman.
 
Top