What's new

Player Watch: Bryan Gil

Zaphod

Well-Known Member
Apr 4, 2021
409
1,715
This is why I always try and stay grounded when we snap up young talent - I seem to remember we all thought the club had done really well to land him and he was a real upcoming talent.

Sometimes these moves just don't work out.
 

funkycoldmedina

Well-Known Member
Jun 20, 2004
1,894
6,239
This is why I always try and stay grounded when we snap up young talent - I seem to remember we all thought the club had done really well to land him and he was a real upcoming talent.

Sometimes these moves just don't work out.
That's the model though. He's been pretty sort after for loans, wages aren't too high and clubs are still willing to take a punt to unearth a gem. Works for us as long as we do our due diligence and don't go for scatter gun approach to young talent.
 

WiganSpur

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
16,025
32,757
He’s gonna be another player we’ve spent big money on that no one wants on a permanent deal, so we’ll have to loan him out until his contract expires. Truly an absolutely atrocious signing for the money and assets (Lamela) outlaid.
Paratici's biggest blunder arguably. We'd have been much better off keeping Lamela around who's still only 32.
 

Ghost Hardware

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
18,365
63,167
Could be most beneficial here striking an accord with Feyenoord over Gil as there would be a few players in return that could do a job here (outside of the obvious in Gimenez) in Geertruida, Wieffer and (to a lesser extent now due to injury) Hartman.

Conversely think it would be a great move for Gil's career to reignite again under Slot.
Liverpool have been talking to Slot and I have a feeling they could well go for him now links with Amorim have cooled. If Slot goes it could be a bad move for him tbh.
 

Ghost Hardware

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
18,365
63,167
Paratici's biggest blunder arguably. We'd have been much better off keeping Lamela around who's still only 32.
I think the problem with Gil is that for two seasons in a row he was sat on the bench for half of them then was sent on loan back to Spain. He has never been given a real chance to adapt to the PL, even to this day

Obviously the transfer was a complete failure, one can’t really deny that, but we have handled his development appallingly imo and never gave the lad a chance to adjust to the league. Yes there is a chance he might never have got used to the PL but barely playing for what now amounts to pretty much two whole seasons (two half seasons and the whole of this one) bar a few games here and there is just bad player management.

Yes I am aware that we supposedly wanted to try and loan him out for the second half of the current season but I can’t really blame him for not wanting to do that for a third season in a row. Really we should have found a PL club at the start of the season for him, the same thing we should have done for the previous two seasons. And if no PL team wanted him at least find a team in a more physical league for him or even the championship with a January recall clause.

I know obviously there are other factors and he is clearly a casualty of the constant changing of management but really from day one, if we thought he wasn’t ready to play any significant role we should have found a good club for him and loaned him out for one or two full seasons straight.

Fact is when we got him he looked like a very good prospect, he was very highly rated in Spain and even had 4 senior caps, but the club were such a mess we didn’t have time to develop and nurture young foreign talent. That makes sense but if we had been clever with loaning him he could have still been developing elsewhere which ether would have brought him to a level where we could use him or kept his value up if we eventually decided he wasn’t right. Instead he was pretty much just left to stagnate.

I’m sure clubs are still interested probably because of how highly rated he was before he moved and he’s still young but there is little doubt in my mind that he hasn’t developed as much as he could have done had we handled him better.
 

tevezito

In the cup for Tottingham
Jun 8, 2004
963
1,611
I think the problem with Gil is that for two seasons in a row he was sat on the bench for half of them then was sent on loan back to Spain. He has never been given a real chance to adapt to the PL, even to this day

Obviously the transfer was a complete failure, one can’t really deny that, but we have handled his development appallingly imo and never gave the lad a chance to adjust to the league. Yes there is a chance he might never have got used to the PL but barely playing for what now amounts to pretty much two whole seasons (two half seasons and the whole of this one) bar a few games here and there is just bad player management.

Yes I am aware that we supposedly wanted to try and loan him out for the second half of the current season but I can’t really blame him for not wanting to do that for a third season in a row. Really we should have found a PL club at the start of the season for him, the same thing we should have done for the previous two seasons. And if no PL team wanted him at least find a team in a more physical league for him or even the championship with a January recall clause.

I know obviously there are other factors and he is clearly a casualty of the constant changing of management but really from day one, if we thought he wasn’t ready to play any significant role we should have found a good club for him and loaned him out for one or two full seasons straight.

Fact is when we got him he looked like a very good prospect, he was very highly rated in Spain and even had 4 senior caps, but the club were such a mess we didn’t have time to develop and nurture young foreign talent. That makes sense but if we had been clever with loaning him he could have still been developing elsewhere which ether would have brought him to a level where we could use him or kept his value up if we eventually decided he wasn’t right. Instead he was pretty much just left to stagnate.

I’m sure clubs are still interested probably because of how highly rated he was before he moved and he’s still young but there is little doubt in my mind that he hasn’t developed as much as he could have done had we handled him better.
He might even have become that 1 on 1 dribbler everyone's crying out for.
 

WiganSpur

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
16,025
32,757
I think the problem with Gil is that for two seasons in a row he was sat on the bench for half of them then was sent on loan back to Spain. He has never been given a real chance to adapt to the PL, even to this day

Obviously the transfer was a complete failure, one can’t really deny that, but we have handled his development appallingly imo and never gave the lad a chance to adjust to the league. Yes there is a chance he might never have got used to the PL but barely playing for what now amounts to pretty much two whole seasons (two half seasons and the whole of this one) bar a few games here and there is just bad player management.

Yes I am aware that we supposedly wanted to try and loan him out for the second half of the current season but I can’t really blame him for not wanting to do that for a third season in a row. Really we should have found a PL club at the start of the season for him, the same thing we should have done for the previous two seasons. And if no PL team wanted him at least find a team in a more physical league for him or even the championship with a January recall clause.

I know obviously there are other factors and he is clearly a casualty of the constant changing of management but really from day one, if we thought he wasn’t ready to play any significant role we should have found a good club for him and loaned him out for one or two full seasons straight.

Fact is when we got him he looked like a very good prospect, he was very highly rated in Spain and even had 4 senior caps, but the club were such a mess we didn’t have time to develop and nurture young foreign talent. That makes sense but if we had been clever with loaning him he could have still been developing elsewhere which ether would have brought him to a level where we could use him or kept his value up if we eventually decided he wasn’t right. Instead he was pretty much just left to stagnate.

I’m sure clubs are still interested probably because of how highly rated he was before he moved and he’s still young but there is little doubt in my mind that he hasn’t developed as much as he could have done had we handled him better.
I'm not criticising Paratici for it. I agreed at the time it was a good move. Certain coaches and the uncertainty hasn't helped him but I also think that he just isn't a fit for the Prem. He's never really come on physically which is down to him more than anyone. Funnily enough, next season there may be a case to actually keep him around if we're not in the Champions League, where he will get more game time under a coach that may be a better fit. Ange does play with touchline wingers. Maybe it's worth considering if all we're gonna get is loans until his contract expires. On the other hand though, he's taking up foreign spots and there's probably better players out there we can replace him with.
 

carpediem991

Well-Known Member
May 31, 2011
8,840
20,317
I'm not criticising Paratici for it. I agreed at the time it was a good move. Certain coaches and the uncertainty hasn't helped him but I also think that he just isn't a fit for the Prem. He's never really come on physically which is down to him more than anyone. Funnily enough, next season there may be a case to actually keep him around if we're not in the Champions League, where he will get more game time under a coach that may be a better fit. Ange does play with touchline wingers. Maybe it's worth considering if all we're gonna get is loans until his contract expires. On the other hand though, he's taking up foreign spots and there's probably better players out there we can replace him with.
There is no reason for him to waste his career anymore at our club. He rarely makes the bench for us at the moment. I'd rather give Santiago a shot tbh.
 

Ghost Hardware

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
18,365
63,167
I'm not criticising Paratici for it. I agreed at the time it was a good move. Certain coaches and the uncertainty hasn't helped him but I also think that he just isn't a fit for the Prem. He's never really come on physically which is down to him more than anyone. Funnily enough, next season there may be a case to actually keep him around if we're not in the Champions League, where he will get more game time under a coach that may be a better fit. Ange does play with touchline wingers. Maybe it's worth considering if all we're gonna get is loans until his contract expires. On the other hand though, he's taking up foreign spots and there's probably better players out there we can replace him with.
Honestly I wasn't really saying you were criticising him. The fact is you are right that he will go down as blunder but I feel like it's only a blunder because how poorly we handled his development. He might never have adjusted to the physicality of the league but he might have still developed into a very good young player if he had played more regular minutes. As it is the most we will probably get for him is around 10-15 mil euros maybe but if he had been getting regular constant game time on loan then we might have got significantly more at the very least if not a useful part of the team.
 

Ghost Hardware

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
18,365
63,167
Looking increasingly likely Liverpool are going for Slot. Supposedly he is now their no 1 candidate. With that in mind Im not sure Gil going to Feyenoord would be the best move for him.
 

Now it's Spursonal

Well-Known Member
Aug 4, 2012
1,598
13,446
Looking increasingly likely Liverpool are going for Slot. Supposedly he is now their no 1 candidate. With that in mind Im not sure Gil going to Feyenoord would be the best move for him.
1617D14A-8E1E-43D3-B283-F9130F0BA554.jpeg
189CCC9D-B385-463B-B0DC-D7061538037A.jpeg


🤞🏻🤞🏻
 
Top