Wasn't the entire team a bit shit in the first part of the season? I think Eriksen gets quite a lot of the blame for that first two months for some reason. Many were below average, including Dele as far as I remember.. But fair enough, Eriksen wasn't good in the first two months and when Eriksen isn't playing well then we are usually struggling - but doesn't that paint a picture of his importance..?
I don't agree with that opinion to be honest. I think if anything, I would say Eriksen let us down. When we had injuries etc we still had players like Son come in and do the business. Wanyama has been solid throughout. Same with Dembele. Dele has been very good throughout the season and our defense has been solid pretty much throughout the season too. The thing that strikes me is Eriksen has taken a third of the season to get going and another third to hit top form, whereas you cant say the same about the others I mentioned. Kane as an example hasn't had the greatest of seasons, has been out injured but when he's come back he's still scored, and my point is bar interruptions he's still produced the goods. Eriksen has not been injured nor had to take a month out like Kane, Toby, Rose, Dembele etc and all those players have still had stand out seasons whereas Eriksen has not imho.
I would have opted for him if he had been an ever-present reliable player who has shone regardless, and he hasnt - and with that in mind he certainly doesn't get my vote.
In fact, I would say he's been one of our underperforming players this season based on my feelings of how he should have performed. And not to put it bluntly, but even Poch alluded to it earlier in the season too when he said he expects more from Eriksen.