Kirito
Well-Known Member
- May 22, 2013
- 4,814
- 9,387
Is that because of attitude or ability? He's definitely better than Vincent.
MOTD thread
- Thread starter prawnsandwich
- Start date
Is that because of attitude or ability? He's definitely better than Vincent.
tiger666
Large Member
- Jan 4, 2005
- 27,978
- 82,216
He also isn't 6 months in a new country and league. Unlike some I haven't written Janssen off yet.
Sweech
Ruh Roh Ressegnon
- Jun 27, 2013
- 6,752
- 16,378
He's also 28 years old and in the same country that he's been in for the entirety of his life.
Not to mention the most important thing a player can be is available for selection - which Carroll practically never is.
Carroll just doesn't score enough goals when he plays. That's his biggest problem.
His stint at Liverpool showed us how 'special' he might have been.
Carroll is effective at times though but no more than a 10 goal a season striker. Kane is on a completely different level
His stint at Liverpool showed us how 'special' he might have been.
Carroll is effective at times though but no more than a 10 goal a season striker. Kane is on a completely different level
nailsy
SC Supporter
- Jul 24, 2005
- 30,536
- 46,630
No. He's a good player on his day, but he's made of glass. How long do you think he'd last with our training? He'd probably get injured just watching us train.
Dundalk_Spur
The only Spur in the village
- Jul 17, 2008
- 4,956
- 7,691
MotD has turned into a shit sandwich of a show.
Jonathan Pearce should stick to Robot Wars, and to not show all the chances??
Licence payers deserve more.
Jonathan Pearce should stick to Robot Wars, and to not show all the chances??
Licence payers deserve more.
Vincent30
Well-Known Member
- Aug 31, 2012
- 900
- 3,694
Carroll regularly has 'injuries' because he has a big cocaine issue. This is well known. Could be a beast but loves the white powder. A big fat no from me.
Only for the late night / early morning baby feeding duties. Kane needs the rest / sleep for the games & training sessions.
E17yid
Well-Known Member
- Jan 21, 2013
- 17,044
- 30,690
When they were showing the Hull game the commentator said something like:
"Hulls new manager doesn't speak very good English but he must've got his message across at HT"
I was expecting a translator in his post match interview and when they got to that bit the guy speaks amazing English, better than Poch.
"Hulls new manager doesn't speak very good English but he must've got his message across at HT"
I was expecting a translator in his post match interview and when they got to that bit the guy speaks amazing English, better than Poch.
Flynn
SC Supporter
- Sep 2, 2004
- 2,537
- 6,722
Well they'll get 29 mins
GodGomes
Well-Known Member
- Jan 18, 2011
- 64
- 375
Can Phil Neville be more biased? John Stones was shite, pure and simple. Trying to vindicate him by saying "everyone was culpable" and blaming Otamendi and Clichy. No, they're all shite. Kudos to Shearer for sticking it to him. Phil was hysterical at one point.
Last edited:
tiger666
Large Member
- Jan 4, 2005
- 27,978
- 82,216
I'd love a pundit to just come out with that. I reckon Scholes would be closest.
Reado
Well-Known Member
- Nov 3, 2008
- 1,032
- 1,460
That was ridiculous. For the first goal he blamed Toure for not following Mirallas' run. The only reason that was Toure's job in the first place was because he dropped into the back 4 as Stones was 20 yards up the pitch for no apparent reason.
The last goal as well Neville blamed Otamendi for not being closer to Lookman. He said "Otamendi should be expecting Stones to make a mistake" (referring to when his clearance was blocked). Why should he? How about he trusts his partner to clear it properly instead.
I mean they were all crap on the day, but to say that Stones wasn't at fault was stupid and incorrect.
