- Apr 1, 2005
- 41,363
- 74,893
I think it is more that theirs is bigger and better than ours - which is a moot point as 'theirs' isn't theirs and it isn't better either.
Not really it is 30 pages of them being jealous and hating their owners.
I think it is more that theirs is bigger and better than ours - which is a moot point as 'theirs' isn't theirs and it isn't better either.
Most of what the fans say about our new stadium are good to be fair.Have West Ham got a thread about how bad our new stadium is yet?
Not really it is 30 pages of them being jealous and hating their owners.
On kumb maybe, but plenty of other sites and Twitter accounts have threads saying the OS/LS is better. Also claiming the higher and unregulated 66,000 capacity is the highest in London team football.
One idiot last week was saying some of our seats are further away from the pitch than theirs.
Many West Ham fans told the chump that this was because ours were elevated and looking downwards compared to theirs being horizontally further away.
One poster on KUMB keeps going on about our arson! Almost tempted to sign up just to ask for his evidence...
Edit: Tbf not even the West Ham fans had acknowledged him
Arson? The steel company?
Didn’t hear any of their fans kicking up a stink when they received £40mil from Newham Council to help them settle in whilst the same council cut youth and mental health provision to a barely functional level.
I did it, keep it schtum thoughTo be fair something about that Fire does seem dodgy and if it were any other club I’m sure most people would bring it up occasionally regardless of whether it has ended up being a great thing for the Tottenham and surrounding area.
Bought by one of Sullivans firms then sold on wasn't it ?You could also mention the chuckle brothers selling The Boleyn for £40 mill which was sold on 2 weeks later for
£60 million.
You could also mention the chuckle brothers selling The Boleyn for £40 mill which was sold on 2 weeks later for
£60 million.
Still a fucking toilet.