- Jan 8, 2006
- 1,447
- 1,053
Sounds too good for us!
For the money they ask for him it's not too good.
Sounds too good for us!
If we sell them. They were for sale last year as well. Nobody wanted them at the price.
I dont think Dier will leave. I think the first 3, Wanyama, Aurier, Davies and maybe Lamela will. I’ll also go out on a limb and say Foyth will be bandied about as leaving, sadly.I'm talking about Eriksen, Toby, Trippier and a few other deadwood. if Dier goes that figure will go up
Doubt Foyth will go poch likes him and his versatility is invaluable. He’s young and I believe poch had high hopes he will develop into a top class playerI dont think Dier will leave. I think the first 3, Wanyama, Aurier, Davies and maybe Lamela will. I’ll also go out on a limb and say Foyth will be bandied about as leaving, sadly.
That's fair enough - I've done that myself.Some spam is used on purpose but some of it is where it is positioned, the amount of times I scroll on my phone and accidentally press spam and then have to delete it and it’s easy to do and not know you’ve done it
I dont think Dier will leave. I think the first 3, Wanyama, Aurier, Davies and maybe Lamela will. I’ll also go out on a limb and say Foyth will be bandied about as leaving, sadly.
I highly doubt that many of our team are actually on the market. I think Davies will stay. Left back is not a priority and Davies might not have had the best season in the world he still is more than good enough to contribute to the team. Aurier might stay, if he doesn't want to leave. Depends though.I agree with all of those, except Foyth. Too young, too versatile and there's no point in selling him now as it's not like he carries a lot of value. If there were questions about his long term fit, a loan would be in order to hopefully boost that value before a permanent deal or reevaluate his progress with hopefully consistent match minutes.
Either way, it's a ton of potential sales, and while that does worry me, we've seen how difficult it's been to shift players and I highly doubt we end up selling 5+ in the window.
For the Italians to pronounce it as a "k" it would have to be spelled "Pocchettino"But so is Pochettino an Italian surname, but in Italian it would be pronounced Pokettino. The Argies bastardise the pronunciation.
Thread needs thisTwo pages of absolute shite. Cheers lads.
Eriksen is absurdly overrated. Good player but doesn’t dictate games and rarely turns up in big matchesHe doesn't have to have pace because he thinks and sees the game quicker than everyone else. Coutinho can stand there and do step overs while Eriksen has already played the through ball.
Coutinho is so absurdly overrated because he can hit a long shot. He is not the passer Eriksen is. De Bruyne is the only pure #10 type in the world I rate over Eriksen.
Both of these statements are untrue.Eriksen is absurdly overrated. Good player but doesn’t dictate games and rarely turns up in big matches
Zombie filthI'm talking about Eriksen, Toby, Trippier and a few other deadwood. if Dier goes that figure will go up
The commentary kept pronouncing it Lo Chelso is that right I thought it was Lo Selso?
And often spitefully.Spam is a silly rating and often used erroneously.
And often spitefully.
Happy birthday by the way.
It’s going to be a long summer...Eriksen is absurdly overrated. Good player but doesn’t dictate games and rarely turns up in big matches
I can assure you I have no tears I genuinely don't care, if you have removed my spam rating please put it back.It’s not spiteful - it’s a lighthearted way to let people who are spamming the thread with inane, boring, unfunny, unoriginal nonsense about pronunciation know that they are spamming the thread. You’ve taken it as spiteful as you’re oversensitive. When it’s literally already been done to death before the guy has even put pen anywhere close to paper, it’s spam. Don’t think you lot understand what the spam rating denotes?
I removed them all, as I was planning to anyway - can’t deal with fully grown men fighting through tears while declaring they don’t care about ratings. I’m aware of the irony of me posting unrelated shit now, so spam me, I don’t care - but it’s annoying for people who click on a thread thinking there must have been an update (due to there being 5 extra pages) to then read through pages of people chatting bollocks about his name.
Yes BrotherI can assure you I have no tears I genuinely don't care, if you have removed my spam rating please put it back.
I think you are wrong about it being spam, I asked a while back and someone answered and I accepted that no problem but then someone else posted a video that contradicted the answer I was given so I asked for clarification and when people tried to clarify you spammed them, why would you do that? Why do you feel you are entitled to get angry when there isn't an update if we are still discussing the subject of the thread?
Feel free to spam me again for this post, I won't spam you as I don't give neg reps, not intentionally anyway, and I don't care if they are given to me, honestly you misjudge me if you think I do.
Respond to this if you like I am done with it now though.
Ah fair enough, I agree, we should keep to the subject of Giovani lo Celso.It means that the bickering is like listening to a couple of girls who are on their "shark week" at the same time. Anyway the point is that there is a lot of pathetic posting in this thread.