Only one year on his contract. Surplus to our needs. He only cost us £4mn. Unless we can get him included in a swap, with a club he wants to sign up with, a loan is the best option to get him off the non-HG list.
Good servant of the club. Deserves respect. But Ange seems to think we need a...
Then a loan makes the most sense.
I don't dislike Dier. He's played a decent part in our team. But I do worry he isn't suited any more. For me, Sanchez is the better suited. But it also matters what their mindset over playing for Spurs is.
Surely the plan is to strengthen if we can? We're not dealing with inanimate objects, or NPCs. The number of variables around fees, agents, our club's needs, other club's needs is staggering. It's more asking to buying a house with a long chain, but for each permutation of player and position...
Doubtful we get anything except a loan fee and his wages off the books, if he decided the bench isn't for him. Perhaps he thinks he'll get one more chance due to cups/ injuries?
He may well have wanted to move on before the shift in manager. If you were scapegoated by fans for the tactical issues caused by big name ego managers, then you might want a fresh start. May still.
But we all wanted Kane to feel it was going to be okay with Ange.
The question then is, why they were below par?
If Ange can use a player we already have, rejuvenation is better than replacement.
If they want to play, have the skill and Ange trusts them, then that's good enough.
Isn't the point of a new manager to get different results with the squad we...
Paratici got suspended/resigned and Munn got delayed. Combined with Lewis issues, it's a good job we have an experienced Chairman, who does have the clubs interest at heart. Levy may not be everyone's cup of tea, but imho his efforts tend to the positive side of the ledger.
As long as his attitude is away from the squad, I don't care if we have to pay his wages on loan.
Shame. He was a talent.
If the Jonathan David rumours hold any water, perhaps a cheap loan for Lille as a sweetener?
As it should be. The furore over Kane overshadowed the fact he had lost heart. I only want players determined to play for spurs.
Even if that means we avoid big names.
True. He's not the sort of player to try to admonish into a move, or a contract. He can now confirm he's going to stay.
But even though he's as rich as Croesus, extension to his contract gives him security. If we offer three/four years, with a buyout clause, or specific clauses, then both sides...
If he's willing to play to his best, I have no problem with him playing out his contract. He cost us little and has served us well. We don't need millions from his sale, unless he forces a move now.
Ideally, he stays and signs a new contract. I hope this happens, because Ange seems set on...
The counterpoint to that, is even if Kane is the consumate professional, if he's then planning a free move next summer, he's not going to risk himself physically. He's already done enough to have stoked the interest of other clubs when the time comes.
If he wants to go, he should be allowed to...
A reminder to those browsing without an account, it's quick and easy to Register Here. Come and join the fun!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.