dagraham
Well-Known Member
- Sep 20, 2005
- 19,130
- 46,118
Maybe so, but Troare was just brute force.
Pedro Neto
- Thread starter Archibald&Crooks
- Start date
Maybe so, but Troare was just brute force.
ikky
Well-Known Member
- Dec 6, 2006
- 9,000
- 21,482
And without any end product.
13VanDerBale13
Well-Known Member
- Jul 12, 2011
- 14,401
- 33,912
Would easily be our best winger
theShiznit
Well-Known Member
- Jul 26, 2004
- 17,900
- 23,959
All our wingers would look good (better) in a counter attacking side with loads of space behind them like Neto has today.
Not saying he's not better or wouldn't improve us (I believe he would) just let's not base it on a performance against a very open attacking team (us)
Not saying he's not better or wouldn't improve us (I believe he would) just let's not base it on a performance against a very open attacking team (us)
Last edited:
carpediem1906
COYS singapore spurs
- Sep 3, 2011
- 816
- 2,391
Killed us today
watching Doku against chelsea, he faces n looks to take on his opponent every time, and opponent had to double team on him
Neto is the same imo
Even if it’s not him, we need someone like that
watching Doku against chelsea, he faces n looks to take on his opponent every time, and opponent had to double team on him
Neto is the same imo
Even if it’s not him, we need someone like that
alfiemacdaddy
Well-Known Member
- Nov 26, 2011
- 298
- 1,207
He’s class. Wolves mate is resigned to losing him in the summer. Just a matter of who to and how much
Yep, said this last summer. There is no one in our attack that oppo teams would seriously be worried at the the thought of one of their defenders caught in one on one situations. I think we will look to address it in the summer and like you say if not Neto, has to be someone in that mould.
mill
Well-Known Member
- May 21, 2007
- 10,406
- 37,140
Definitely, our attack is the weakest part of our team imo
THOWIG
Well-Known Member
- Feb 14, 2005
- 6,504
- 8,357
Yeah it’s too slow and predictable. We need at least one top class winger. Two would be ideal if players leave.
Nick-TopSpursMan
Well-Known Member
- Aug 4, 2005
- 4,132
- 19,834
We definitely need 2 wingers.
Honestly our attack lacks so much quality compared to City, Scum and Liverpool imo.
Son needs to be played at striker and rotated with either Richarlison or a new striker. If we’re being brutally honest and really want to progress, probably a new striker.
Honestly our attack lacks so much quality compared to City, Scum and Liverpool imo.
Son needs to be played at striker and rotated with either Richarlison or a new striker. If we’re being brutally honest and really want to progress, probably a new striker.
1882andallthat
Well-Known Member
- Feb 2, 2009
- 2,850
- 4,199
I'd say he was easily the most influential player on the pitch on the day yesterday and in all honesty was key the difference that I believe ultimately consigned us to getting jack all out of the game.
Hazelton
Unknown Member
- Jul 11, 2011
- 5,620
- 19,601
I think Richarlison, Son, Veliz are fine as ST options for now. Son is not a winger so we either need one player who is the top, top level that can play LW and RW, i.e. Neto, or we go for one of each who are younger and cheaper.
I'd go all in for Neto and give ourselves Neto, Son, Richarlison, Kulusevski, Johnson, Veliz, Donley as forward options. We have other issues to sort out too so two wingers probably isn't realistic. Neto, Bergvall, Lloyd Kelly on a free and whoever our chosen DM is. I'd be happy with that.
I'd go all in for Neto and give ourselves Neto, Son, Richarlison, Kulusevski, Johnson, Veliz, Donley as forward options. We have other issues to sort out too so two wingers probably isn't realistic. Neto, Bergvall, Lloyd Kelly on a free and whoever our chosen DM is. I'd be happy with that.
Ghost Hardware
Well-Known Member
- Aug 31, 2012
- 18,328
- 63,034
I think Son can still play winger but only in certain games. Tbh I feel the same about him as a CF, it really depends on the opponent. Regardless of that i agree, need two and one of them shouldn’t be Werner imo. In theory one could be Solomon but realistically he should probably be moved on unless we are convinced he’s past his issues. Which I doubt we would be. It’s a shame as do think he could offer something but I’d feel very nervous about going into next season with him as an option.
Our attacking line has been an issue all season, it’s just not up to the level of the rest of the first team imo. Just bringing in Neto say isn’t going to fix all our issues. Yes he would help a lot but I think we need more.
Personally I’d be getting rid of Gil, Solomon and probably letting Werner leave then putting a good chunk of our summer budget on two wingers, one for each side.
bceej
Well-Known Member
- Mar 1, 2013
- 2,453
- 3,209
That's a "he's on the market...for a price" statement. If Ange can sell him Spurs, we should go all out for him.
