- Jun 26, 2012
- 5,870
- 18,665
Has anyone yet said that we should move Höjbjerg first if we want Gallagher?
No but I’ve heard that PEH needs to be shifted before we could sign Gallagher.
Hope this helps
Has anyone yet said that we should move Höjbjerg first if we want Gallagher?
Don’t want us to spend £40m + on this guy. Don’t think he’s all that personally, plus it seems like he’s been forced out due to their FFP issues, rather than even really wanting to come.
Would rather we put funds like that towards a forward.
I know it makes sense not to have too many midfielders but it's worth remembering that we get through five or six midfielders in a game, Hojbjerg is not a starter but he played a part most games even before our injuries and AFCON.
A few people asked why Chelsea didn't accept the West Ham bid but it is possible the player blanked it, maybe knowing of our interest maybe not but if they're not going to give him a new contract he can make his own decisions.
I don’t think that was ever the reasonI'm assuming that the early return of Pape Sarr from the ACN after yesterday's shoot-out defeat will take some of the pressure off Spurs to add to their midfield numbers?
Trying to find something to disagree with in that but can't find a single word.Long-term I don't think PEH, Skipp or GLC make it with us.
3 from Bissouma, Sarr, Bentancur, Maddison, Gallagher gives us a ton of options and depth and time to bring through some of the kids.
Agree with this, with Deki potentially being an option to replace Maddison in certain situations.Long-term I don't think PEH, Skipp or GLC make it with us.
3 from Bissouma, Sarr, Bentancur, Maddison, Gallagher gives us a ton of options and depth and time to bring through some of the kids.
They need to sell they just don't need to sell Gallagher. They're trying to flog broja for 50m and no doubt have other players like challobah they'd rather flog first. Gallagher is just the most saleable asset they have.I don't understand Chelsea with this. If they 'need' to sell for FFP then at some point they would need to sell. Thinking about selling, talking about selling, leaking to the press that you are open to selling doesn't bring the money in. If they aren't offering him a new deal and willing to let him get to 12 months out then clearly they would like to sell, but do they not need to get on with it, either now or early in the summer?
I can understand bringing in Gallagher and not letting anyone go looks like we'll be carrying too many Midfielders, but we did the opposite in the last window and let Davinson out knowing we would be one short and would fix it later. Maybe the suits can return the favour to Ange on this for dealing with that CB situation
Gallagher is pure profit though as he is from their academyThey need to sell they just don't need to sell Gallagher. They're trying to flog broja for 50m and no doubt have other players like challobah they'd rather flog first. Gallagher is just the most saleable asset they have.
All 3 of them areGallagher is pure profit though as he is from their academy
As are Broja and Chalobah. That’s why the rumours are about selling them too. £100m profit probably needs all 3 of them sold.Gallagher is pure profit though as he is from their academy
They need to sell they just don't need to sell Gallagher. They're trying to flog broja for 50m and no doubt have other players like challobah they'd rather flog first. Gallagher is just the most saleable asset they have.
Exactly, Gallagher would probably be last on the list Poch wants out, if this happens it's deadline day but doubt it willAs are Broja and Chalobah. That’s why the rumours are about selling them too. £100m profit probably needs all 3 of them sold.