weststandyid
Well-Known Member
- Jun 4, 2004
- 459
- 1,358
THFCSPURS19
The Speaker of the Transfer Rumours Forum
- Jan 6, 2013
- 37,891
- 130,525
Well, kiddo, it’s a loan with obligation to buy so we will sign him on a perm next season but for now we pay a smallish fee (so in theory we have more money) and gets around PSG’s sell-on clause.
Go to bed.
SlotBadger
({})?
- Jul 24, 2013
- 13,923
- 43,657
They’re saying it’s a fixed loan, so he can’t be recalled.
Snarfalicious
Well-Known Member
- Jul 15, 2012
- 15,722
- 72,066
We give Betis one apple now so big bully PSG can’t take it before Betis can eat it. We then give them 4 apples later when big bully PSG no longer has a right to any apples because the big bully PSG graduated and is no longer around to take their apples.
Or something.
Luka Van der Bale
Well-Known Member
- Jan 29, 2011
- 6,041
- 13,611
We’re loaning him for a year before purchasing next summer. Means Betis owe PSG less money (the sell on doesn’t take into account the loan fee), and potentially frees us up some money this summer for further business...
Martin91
Well-Known Member
- Jun 26, 2014
- 660
- 1,652
Like you mean to pay someone’s image rights ?
absolute bobbins
Am Yisrael Chai
- Feb 12, 2013
- 11,656
- 25,971
No, it’s loan with obligation to buy.
International loans can’t be recalled before they expire either
markiespurs
SC Supporter
- Jul 9, 2008
- 11,899
- 15,576
Total genius from Levy if this frees up cash for Dybala
NYSpur
Well-Known Member
- Jul 22, 2013
- 635
- 2,382
I don’t think this is as much about freeing up cash. It’s about getting Betis what they need out of the deal we have been offering based on what we have been willing to spend, which was always substantial.
Last edited:
Snarfalicious
Well-Known Member
- Jul 15, 2012
- 15,722
- 72,066
Well it sure as shit can’t hurt us in our pursuit of other moves.
weststandyid
Well-Known Member
- Jun 4, 2004
- 459
- 1,358
hopefully does both. enables the GLC deal to happen, and pushes the majority of the fee in to next summer's budget (if that was going to exist!).
NYSpur
Well-Known Member
- Jul 22, 2013
- 635
- 2,382
Perhaps, but there is one point that doesn’t make sense to me though. Wouldn’t this require Betis to resign Lo Celso so that he can get the wages that we agreed to with him in his personal terms since he is still their property? Just trying to figure out how he gets the wages we agreed to unless this was always part of it.
carmeldevil
Well-Known Member
- May 15, 2018
- 7,667
- 45,873
Only if he scores the winning goal in the CL final.
weststandyid
Well-Known Member
- Jun 4, 2004
- 459
- 1,358
I assume as part of the loan contract? we take over responsibility for his salary and can pay him an agreed sum.
I can't see any reason why this wouldn't be the case or why there'd be any issue. mbappe will have been paid far more during his loan period at psg, same for ndombele at lyon etc.
edit: resign?? he'll still be their player!
weststandyid
Well-Known Member
- Jun 4, 2004
- 459
- 1,358
annoying though if he get's recalled during the match?
Don't worry about it. Foreign clubs do these deals all the time. It is effectively just finance spreading to get around clauses and shift money around different financial periods (usually for FFP).
Doesn't effect the deal one jot and we will pay him as if he's ours.
NYSpur
Well-Known Member
- Jul 22, 2013
- 635
- 2,382
Ok, I didn’t realize we can do that.
Well lads, I'm going to sign off early here and going to tuck into bed with a Heineken (in honor of Danny Rose wanting to stay) and my copy of Brave New World, in the hope, and a bit of belief, that our Poch will be happy with DL's efforts this window. Remember fellow fans that our lot in life, once we embraced the boys from WHL, is for it to be, forever, about the journey.... COYS!!!
carmeldevil
Well-Known Member
- May 15, 2018
- 7,667
- 45,873
Similar threads
