What's new

Harry Winks - Leicester City

viktorviktor

Well-Known Member
Nov 25, 2014
398
1,827
He is playing a very disciplined game at the moment, which could pass as boring or unexceptional. IMO, this is a tactical decision by Poch, necessitated by our weak midfield, and is not necessarily a reflection of Winks ability. He will be a better player with a real DM in the team.
 

GetSpurredOn

Well-Known Member
Jun 18, 2006
5,022
8,922
He is playing a very disciplined game at the moment, which could pass as boring or unexceptional. IMO, this is a tactical decision by Poch, necessitated by our weak midfield, and is not necessarily a reflection of Winks ability. He will be a better player with a real DM in the team.

Agree. Winks is currently filling in the DM role, and as such has to tailor his game to suit. Once either Dier or Wanyama are back in, you then see Winks become far more progressive with his passing, but also his movement. These occasions where he gives the ball and immediately moves into another pocket of space to provide an option, when less shackled by the DM role he moves upfield not just side to side, and isn’t afraid to stride forward with the ball. A very underrated player in my opinion, maybe never going to be as prolific as Alli, or flashy, but a fantastic technical all round midfielder who makes others tick.
 

THFCSPURS19

The Speaker of the Transfer Rumours Forum
Jan 6, 2013
37,890
130,524
Really? I find it staggering that he's not good enough for a top 6 team. Here I was thinking that he's made 17 appearances for the team that currently sits 2nd, but I must be wrong.

What an unambiguously garbage post.
The problem is that some people expect Winks to be as creative as Eriksen, which just isn't his role at all.
 

longtimespur

Well-Known Member
Sep 10, 2014
5,833
9,950
Agree. Winks is currently filling in the DM role, and as such has to tailor his game to suit. Once either Dier or Wanyama are back in, you then see Winks become far more progressive with his passing, but also his movement. These occasions where he gives the ball and immediately moves into another pocket of space to provide an option, when less shackled by the DM role he moves upfield not just side to side, and isn’t afraid to stride forward with the ball. A very underrated player in my opinion, maybe never going to be as prolific as Alli, or flashy, but a fantastic technical all round midfielder who makes others tick.

Only by some.:notworthy:
I think he as a very real chance of becoming a top player, barring injuries which seemed to have stalled him of late.
 

Primativ

Well-Known Member
Aug 9, 2017
3,229
12,486
I remember the days Carrick was under-appareciated on here too...

The more he plays the more he’ll gain confident / settle and show his full abilities.

Most players improve with age / have multiple seasons under their belt in top flight.

I remember the days when Carrick was under appreciated too. I wasn’t one of them, I know how players are supposed to play the deep lying playmaker role thanks very much.
He’s nowhere near Carricks level, even first season at Spurs level carrick.
 

thebenjamin

Well-Known Member
Jul 1, 2008
12,261
38,948
I remember the days when Carrick was under appreciated too. I wasn’t one of them, I know how players are supposed to play the deep lying playmaker role thanks very much.
He’s nowhere near Carricks level, even first season at Spurs level carrick.

Carrick played further forward when he first joined us.
 

Charly***

no idea
Aug 20, 2008
4,209
7,052
I remember the days when Carrick was under appreciated too. I wasn’t one of them, I know how players are supposed to play the deep lying playmaker role thanks very much.
He’s nowhere near Carricks level, even first season at Spurs level carrick.

No but few are.
 

Primativ

Well-Known Member
Aug 9, 2017
3,229
12,486
JFC where to start.

This post demonstrates why the problem is your ridiculous expectation and complete lack of understanding of the role he's playing, and not his performances.

"His ball retention is generally very high, but that's because he always passes the ball 5 yards left to right."

Well, first, that's just flat out wrong. He's shown on a number of occasions that he is more than capable of playing lofted balls over the top, or cross field switches to contribute to attacking (ie his ball to KWP the other day and the one to Trips against RM at Wembley last season come to mind). But always playing those "Hollywood" balls isn't the sign of a good player, and it's ridiculous that you think this is what he needs to do from his position, because it's just not, and thinking otherwise is generally the sign of a poor football judge.

He is supposed to play those short passes in different stages of the game and for different reasons. When we've had a period of attacking play, it's necessary for him to do that in order to retain possession while the players ahead of him regain their attacking shape and get back into position. Playing recklessly is the last thing you want in that situation because if we lose the ball we are not in a position to win it back, or to defend the counter.

Alternatively, when the opposition are deep and compact behind the ball, you'll often see Eriksen move a lot deeper and play short little combination passes with Winks, as by far the two best technical players in midfield, in order to pull the opposition out of shape and create the space between the lines for any of Dele, Son or Kane to drop into, or to give Sissoko space to burst forward. Again, it would be stupidly reckless to attempt the killer ball as regularly as you seem to want him to in this situation because there's no space for it, and we also have players further forward who are better equipped to do so. It would be a dreadful waste of possession if he was to be impatient and squander that possession because Primativ on SC doesn't understand what he's being asked to do.

He's also playing as the deepest midfielder. If he loses the ball there, the opposition are immediately running at out central defenders with our FBs high and wide and no cover in midfield. That was the problem against Wolves. We lost the ball due to sloppiness (especially uncharacteristically from Eriksen) and they had too much space. Imagine if this happened on the regular of complaints that Winks isn't penetrative enough? Another reason why is's important is because he's playing alongside a guy who, for all his improvement and physical strengths, doesn't count ball retention high in his list of footballing talents.

In fact, if anything, the fact that he is playing so sensibly and not in the manner in you wish is actually a sign of great maturity in one so young. Often the problem with youthful CMs and CBs too, to a lesser extent, is that they're too impatient and too naive and too impulsive and too callow by doing the stuff that looks good, and not the stuff of actual substance. The way he plays demonstrates an understanding of the game far beyond his years.

"As I say, he never does anything in a game which makes me go AHA! So that is why he's in the side"

And that there is exactly the problem, not Winks' ability.

With all due respect I totally know how a player is supposed to play that role. I’m not saying he doesn’t have a good pass in his locker. It’s funny that you mention that KWP pass because that is literally one of the only times he’s displayed some progressive passing this season.

It’s like people saying Dier is a great long passer because of that Pass to Alli at The Bridge last season.

Winks is always too safe and timid with his passing, it’s nothing to do with who his midfield partner is. He is exactly the same next to Dembele, Dier or whoever else.

People seem to make excuses for him now, like
It’s because who he is playing next to. Well, if one player out of the two is getting dropped it isn’t Sissoko...

People always revert to the “oh you don’t understand the game if you can’t see what he is good at” argument. It’s nonsense. Some of us just think we need more than he offers. Out of all the CMs at City, Liverpool and Spurs, Winks is by distance the weakest. We need to upgrade that position. Winks is a squad player but not a first 11 shoe in.

JFC indeed.
 

Primativ

Well-Known Member
Aug 9, 2017
3,229
12,486
No but few are.

Of course. People shouldn’t compare them though. Winks will likely never get near to that level. The neglect of Carrick by England was criminal. Absolutely key cog in multiple title winning teams under Ferguson.
 

Primativ

Well-Known Member
Aug 9, 2017
3,229
12,486
Carrick played further forward when he first joined us.

He did but he just had far more attributes too. His range of passing, technique, awareness, weight of pass, vision, dribbling ability. Winks hasn’t displayed anything near to Carricks level.

Winks is a solid technical footballer, no doubt. I don’t see him at the level we need going forward though.

Look I may be proven wrong, it’s just how I view it watching him every week.
 

Charly***

no idea
Aug 20, 2008
4,209
7,052
Of course. People shouldn’t compare them though. Winks will likely never get near to that level. The neglect of Carrick by England was criminal. Absolutely key cog in multiple title winning teams under Ferguson.

Yep, Winks is tidy & it’s more shorter stuff from him compared to Carrick, more like a modern day Scott Parker for me, more creative than Parker ended up, but Parker was creative when he was younger. I think Winks could be a top English player tho, just he doesn’t have that extra something that Carrick had.
 

Primativ

Well-Known Member
Aug 9, 2017
3,229
12,486
Yep, Winks is tidy & it’s more shorter stuff from him compared to Carrick, more like a modern day Scott Parker for me, more creative than Parker ended up, but Parker was creative when he was younger. I think Winks could be a top English player tho, just he doesn’t have that extra something that Carrick had.

That’s exactly what I see! He is a modern day Scott Parker. A bit more creative but like you say, Parker was different when he started to how he was when he was at Spurs later in his career! I think he’s less tenacious and aggressive to what Parker was too.
 

theShiznit

Well-Known Member
Jul 26, 2004
17,869
23,921
We have seen him make incisive passes in different games. When the game is open he can and will pass between the lines. When there are runners in behind he can pass over the top. And he can got lofted switch passes.

In game like the Cardiff one where they are keeping 11 men in their own half he and most players are marked he is tasked with moving the ball quickly to players better placed than himself and getting into position to receive the ball from whoever has it.

He is doing what is asked of him ATM and is growing/learning all the time.
I Look forward to setting how he develops and grows as a player and the role he ultimately settled into.
 

DJS

A hoonter must hoont
Dec 9, 2006
31,266
21,766
I remember the days when Carrick was under appreciated too. I wasn’t one of them, I know how players are supposed to play the deep lying playmaker role thanks very much.
He’s nowhere near Carricks level, even first season at Spurs level carrick.

Was just using Carrick as example, Winks is more of a number 8 (although is versatile can can play defensive midfield when needed).

I prefer him alongside a defensive midfielder myself (Skipp eventually ???).
 

LexingtonSpurs

Well-Known Member
Aug 27, 2013
13,456
39,042
I like Winks. My only complaint is that he seems to have a few lazy passes in him each match - the kind that are just short of the target, and either put the player under immediate pressure, or are open to interception.

He is a confidence player, and as he gains more confidence, he elevates his game. I think he is going to be just fine. He'll always need a stronger defensive partner, but that is true of many CMs.
 

fortworthspur

Well-Known Member
Nov 12, 2007
11,248
17,550
sky's the limit with this guy. if he's able to do the same thing further up the pitch in less space he'll be great.
 

Westmorlandspur

Well-Known Member
Feb 1, 2013
2,834
4,684
Sorry my bad.
He came to us from W.Ham
Misread Wiki.

Remember the 'too small for the Premiership'
with regard to Modric
and that persisted
for a couple of seasons.

My general point stands though.
he is a precocious talent
held up by injury.

Carrick has always been undervalued
hence only 34 appearances for England
over 14 years.

Modric is now the Worlds Numero Uno.
If Winks gets even close to those two
he will have fulfilled
all my hopes for him.
I thought Carrick would have been a top player for England but the reason he only got 34 caps was because he never performed. I cannot remember a match when I thought he had played well. However playing for the best team in England is somewhat easier.
 

@Bobby__Lucky

Well-Known Member
Aug 20, 2013
2,933
3,982
he reminds me a a bit of Ossie.

I was watching a foreign stars history program the other day and when focused on ossie the talk was all about wherever on the pitch you was ossie was always available to pass too. This part I agree he does and is underrated in not just winks but in footballers in general. If Tom huddlestone had this sector of abiligy he would of been an out and out superstar. He does have shade of ossie but just not as good. Ossie is the reason I suport spurs.
 

ralphs bald spot

Well-Known Member
Jul 14, 2015
2,777
5,177
Any comparison with Ossie is very generous in the extreme. Ossie was a great player who in many ways along with Thiysen and Muhren at Ipswich helped change the English game from being very insular. Modric is a near comparison but for his time at Tottenham Ossie was better.

Winks I like and he continues to improve and that's all anyone can ask
 
Top