Some form of shit was started by signing him, there is no doubt about that.Did we start all this shit by paying £30m for Sissoko?
Did we start all this shit by paying £30m for Sissoko?
50m for 27 yr old is way too much. By the time he hit 30, his value is 10% of buy price.
No, city did with Stones.
Some form of shit was started by signing him, there is no doubt about that.
I think it's a stretch too far to essentially blame an over-inflated bubble football market on the panic actions of a dwarfed, hairless PL club director and an Argentinian with so poor English he didn't understand what he was agreeing to.Preach. I just feel like signing a shithouse footballer from a relegated team for £30m when he has no discernible ability has led to other teams realising they can take the piss. Maybe it's just the TV money, though.
Did we start all this shit by paying £30m for Sissoko?
Did we start all this shit by paying £30m for Sissoko?
Bid of £40m from Everton rejected by Swansea according to Jim White on Talkshite.
That was in response to Chelsea spunking £50m on Fernando TorresI blame Liverpool for spending £35m on Andy Carroll.
That was in response to Chelsea spunking £50m on Fernando Torres
For those that were asking, from the Times;
So Everton could end up part funding us buying Barkley from them?
Nice.